TECHTARGET INC (TTGT)
Communication Services · Digital Marketing & Advertising Technology · NASDAQ
TechTarget provides intent-based marketing and sales intelligence solutions that help B2B technology companies identify and engage active buyers.
What TECHTARGET INC does
TechTarget provides marketing and sales services for business-to-business (B2B) technology companies. The company uses proprietary data, including purchase intent signals, to help technology vendors identify, engage, and convert prospects throughout their buying cycles through digital advertising, data-driven research, and content marketing platforms. Following a recent business combination, the company now integrates legacy TechTarget operations with the former Informa Tech Digital Businesses.
Themes: B2B marketing technology, intent data, sales intelligence, digital advertising, IT research and media
Fundamentals
- Price$3.82 as of 2026-08-21 close
- Market cap$276M as of 2026-08-21
- 1-year return-36.5% 2025-08-21 close $6.02 → 2026-08-21 close $3.82
- P/En/a negative earnings
- Net margin-113.7% as of 2026-08-24
- Gross margin+59.6% as of 2026-08-24
- ROE-93.2% as of 2026-08-24
- Debt / equity0.23 as of 2026-08-24
- Revenue growth (YoY)+52.3% as of 2026-08-24
- Revenue CAGR (3y)+35.2% SEC XBRL
- Beta1.24 as of 2026-08-24
- Last reported earnings2026-08-06 SEC EDGAR Form 8-K (Item 2.02)
How TTGT compares in its sector
- net profit marginbottom 10% 132 covered Communication Services peers, as of 2026-08-24
- operating marginbottom 10% 132 covered Communication Services peers, as of 2026-08-24
- gross marginmiddle range 132 covered Communication Services peers, as of 2026-08-24
- return on equitybottom 10% 132 covered Communication Services peers, as of 2026-08-24
- 3-year revenue CAGRtop 10% 121 covered Communication Services peers
- free cash flow (absolute dollars, latest fiscal year)middle range 114 covered Communication Services peers, as of FY2025
Position among covered Communication Services companies that report each metric (minimum 5 peers). A relative position within our covered catalog — not a valuation, quality, or investment judgment. A higher percentile is simply a higher value (for P/E, more expensive on earnings — never "better"). Informational only.
How TECHTARGET INC looks technically
TECHTARGET INC (TTGT) is trading 17.3% below its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a long-term downtrend. Its 50-day average crossed below its 200-day average about 505 trading days ago — a "death cross", a bearish long-term signal. There is no clear trend right now — the price is choppy (ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 18, below the 25 that marks a real trend). Momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 46, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30). MACD, a trend-momentum gauge, turned bearish about 10 trading days ago (its momentum flipped negative). It made a new 20-day high about 18 trading days ago. It is 46.6% below its highest point of the past year.
Trend
8
| Distance from the 200-day | it is trading 17.3% below its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a long-term downtrend | -17.3% |
|---|---|---|
| 50-day moving average | its average price over the last 50 trading days — a short-term trend line — is $3.86 | $3.86 |
| 200-day moving average | its average price over the last 200 trading days — the long-term trend line — is $4.62 | $4.62 |
| Swing structure | each recent peak has been higher than the one before it and each dip has been shallower — the pattern chart-watchers call an uptrend, which describes where price has already been and not where it goes next | higher highs and higher lows |
| Last swing turn | its last significant turn was a swing low 14 calendar days ago — the swings before that are what the structure reading is measured on | 14 sessions |
| Wave structure | its recent swings can be read as a five-part upward sequence — what Elliott-wave chartists call an impulse — now in leg 3 of five; the labelling fails if price closes below 3.4. It is one of several labellings that fit, and it describes the swings already printed, not what comes next. The same swings also read as a three-part correction in leg C. | possible upward five-wave sequence, in wave 3 (one of several readings) |
| Since the 50/200 cross | its 50-day average crossed below its 200-day average about 505 trading days ago — a "death cross", a bearish long-term signal | 505 sessions |
| Trend strength (14-day ADX) | there is no clear trend right now — the price is choppy (ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 18, below the 25 that marks a real trend) | 18.1 |
Momentum
3
| 14-day RSI | momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 46, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30) | 46.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Position in its 14-day range | it is trading in the lower half of its 14-day range ($3.40 to $4.53) — its "stochastic" reading is 37 out of 100, where 0 would mean closing exactly at the 14-session low and 100 exactly at the high. This measures WHERE the price sits inside its recent range, which is a different question from the RSI beside it: RSI is a momentum gauge, measuring how FAST the price has been moving, so a stock can drift quietly to the bottom of its range with an ordinary RSI, or fall sharply and still sit in the middle. It has been climbing within that range over the last few sessions. | 37.2 |
| Since the MACD crossed zero | MACD, a trend-momentum gauge, turned bearish about 10 trading days ago (its momentum flipped negative) | 10 sessions |
Range
12
| 52-week high | its highest closing price over the past year (about 252 trading days) was $7.15 | $7.15 |
|---|---|---|
| From the 52-week high | it is 46.6% below its 52-week high (its highest price of the past year) | -46.6% |
| Above the 52-week low | it is 13.4% above its 52-week low (its lowest price of the past year) | +13.3% |
| Below the 52-week high | it is 46.6% below its highest point of the past year | 46.6% |
| Since a 20-day breakout | it made a new 20-day high about 18 trading days ago | 18 sessions |
| Since a 55-day breakout | it made a new 55-day low about 21 trading days ago | 21 sessions |
| All-time high | its highest closing price on record is $111.44 (set on 2021-11-17) | $111.44 |
| Given back of the 52-week move | over the past year its closes ranged ($3.40 to $6.98), and it has recovered only a small part of its fall from last year’s high — 12% of it. Chart-watchers call 61.8%-65% given back the "golden pocket" — for this company that is $5.61 to $5.73. It is watched widely enough that orders cluster there, which is the honest reason it matters; it is not a forecast. | 11.7% |
| From the all-time high | it is 96.6% below its all-time high | -96.6% |
| Nearest price level | it is trading 10.9% above a support level at $3.40 — a price it turned at four times since 2026-02-25, most recently on 2026-08-07. Since 2024-08-21 it has 1 such level below the current price and 12 above. Levels like these describe where the price has reversed or paused before; they are not a forecast of where it will go. | -10.9% |
| All-time low | its lowest closing price on record is $2.13 (set on 2009-04-01) | $2.13 |
| Above the all-time low | it is 79.3% above its all-time low | +79.3% |
Volatility
5
| Band width vs its own 6 months | day-to-day price swings are about average versus its own recent 6-month history | 35th percentile |
|---|---|---|
| Typical daily range | in a typical session it travels about $0.2699 between its high and its low — about 7.1% of its price. That is its "average true range" over the last 14 sessions, which also counts the distance from the previous close, so a day that opens well away from yesterday counts as the large move it was | $0.2699 |
| Bollinger bands (20-day, ±2σ) | most of its recent trading has stayed between about $3.43 and $4.70 — the "Bollinger bands", a range drawn two standard deviations either side of its 20-day average price, which widens when the stock gets more volatile and narrows when it settles | $3.43 – $4.07 – $4.70 |
| Typical daily range (% of price) | its price moves about 7.1% in a typical session — more volatile than most companies we cover. This is the average gap between a session's high and low over the last 14 sessions, counting overnight moves, expressed against the current price so it can be compared with companies trading at any price | 7.1% |
| Stretch from the 200-day average | it is trading 3.0 daily ranges below its 200-day average price (17.3% below it in plain percentage terms) — a way of asking how far it has stretched from its own average in units of how far it normally moves in a day, so a calm company and a jumpy one can be compared on the same scale | 3.0 daily ranges below its 200-day average |
Volume
1
| Volume vs its 30-day average | trading volume is about normal versus its 30-day average | 0.64× |
|---|
Analyst
2
| Change in the average price target | analysts have cut their average price target by 28.1% since the prior reading | -28.1% |
|---|---|---|
| Change in the consensus rating | the analyst consensus rating is unchanged since the prior reading | unchanged |
Candlestick patterns
2
| Since a hammer | today, after a stretch of decline, it sold off hard during the session and then closed back near its high — a "hammer", the long lower wick showing the drop was bought back before the close | today |
|---|---|---|
| Since a bullish engulfing | 1 session ago it opened below the previous session's close and finished above that session's open — a "bullish engulfing" pair, where one up day more than undid the down day before it | 1 session ago |
Price gaps
3
| Gap at the open | it opened on 2026-08-21 0.8% below the previous session's close — an overnight gap, the part of the move that happened while the market was shut, and had not traded back through that level by the close | -0.8% |
|---|---|---|
| Open gap | it gapped 20.9% below the previous close 10 sessions ago and has not traded back through the level it left behind at 4.31 — an "unfilled gap", which describes a price range no trade has since crossed and is not a forecast that it will be crossed | -20.9% |
| Gap filled | a 2.3% gap down opened on 2026-08-11 has been "filled" 4 sessions ago — price traded back through the level the gap left behind, and it took 4 sessions to close | 4 sessions ago |
Price streaks
1
| Closing streak | it closed lower in its latest session, after a session that did not close lower — a single down day rather than a run | 1 session down |
|---|
Relative strength
4
| vs market, 1 month | over the past 1 month this stock beat the market by 4.1 percentage points (the stock gained 6.4% while the market gained 2.3%) | +4.1% |
|---|---|---|
| vs market, 3 months | over the past 3 months this stock lagged the market by 19.9 percentage points (the stock lost 16.8% while the market gained 3.1%) | -19.9% |
| vs market, 6 months | over the past 6 months this stock lagged the market by 31.0 percentage points (the stock lost 19.9% while the market gained 11.1%) | -31.0% |
| vs market, 12 months | over the past 12 months this stock lagged the market by 57.0 percentage points (the stock lost 36.5% while the market gained 20.5%) | -57.0% |
Signal agreement
2
| Bullish technical signals | 0 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bullish state — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 0 of 9 |
|---|---|---|
| Bearish technical signals | 5 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bearish state: a "death cross" — its 50-day average is below its 200-day, trading below its 200-day average, MACD momentum is negative, lagging the market over 6 months, trading below the Ichimoku cloud — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 5 of 9 |
Trend (Ichimoku cloud)
1
| Vs the Ichimoku cloud | trading 3.0% below the Ichimoku cloud — a band drawn from where its own highs and lows sat up to 2026-07-16 and projected forward over today's price, the side traders read as an established downtrend, with the band above acting as the level that would have to be cleared. The band itself is thick, spanning 30.5% of the share price, which is taken to mean a barrier that has held for a while and takes effort to cross. | -3.0% |
|---|
Volume-weighted price
2
| Vs this year’s average price paid | the price is 16% below the average price paid so far this year, so the typical buyer over that stretch is under water. That average is $4.53 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 157 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP. | -15.6% |
|---|---|---|
| Vs the average paid since it last reported | the price is 6% below the average price paid since it last reported on 2026-07-29 (its 8-K), so the typical buyer over that stretch is under water. That average is $4.07 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 18 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP. | -6.2% |
Price levels it has turned at before
TTGT last closed at $3.82 on 2026-08-21. Since 2024-08-21 it has turned at 1 price below its last close and 12 above; the nearest below and the 3 nearest above are listed, nearest first.
| Level | Side | Distance | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.40 | Support | 10.9% below the last close | turned there four times · 2026-02-25 to 2026-08-07 |
| $4.66 | Resistance | 22.0% above the last close | turned there three times · 2025-11-07 to 2026-04-06 |
| $4.82 | Resistance | 26.2% above the last close | turned there twice · 2026-03-12 to 2026-08-03 |
| $4.93 | Resistance | 29.0% above the last close | turned there twice · 2025-12-23 to 2026-01-14 |
A level is a price this company reversed or paused at more than once — they describe past behaviour, not a forecast of where the price will go.
Wave structure
Its recent swings can be read as a five-part upward sequence — what Elliott-wave chartists call an impulse — now in leg 3 of five.
This labelling fails — stops being a possible reading at all — if it closes below $3.40.
This is one of several labellings that fit the same swings, so treat it as a reading rather than the reading. It was chosen from 2 labellings that survived the rules, counting shorter readings of the same bars.
On past moves of this shape the leg has usually ended somewhere between $4.83 and $5.71 — that is where it has tended to end if the count holds, not a forecast of where the price goes.
Alternate reading: The same swings also read as a three-part correction in leg C, which fails on a close below $3.40.
This reading has stood for 6 trading days, since 2026-08-14.
Read from daily closes as of 2026-08-21.
An Elliott-wave count describes the swings already printed and the level that would disprove it. It is not a forecast, a target, or advice.
Screens: Trading below the 200-day moving average · Pulled back from the 12-month high · trendless / choppy (low ADX) · Analyst price target recently CUT · lagging the market · Printed a hammer candle after a decline | Learn: moving average · golden cross · adx · rsi · macd · breakout · fifty two week high low
Based on daily closing prices as of 2026-08-21. Describes past price behavior only — informational, not financial advice.
Analyst consensus
- Consensus ratingStrong Buy (1.33 mean, 1=Strong Buy…5=Strong Sell) — 3 analysts
- Mean price target$7.67 range $7.00 – $8.00; median $8.00
Analyst estimates, as of 2026-08-17. These are third-party analyst opinions and price targets, aggregated — not a recommendation, prediction, or advice from stocks-llm. Informational only.
Analyst EPS estimate for TTGT
- Consensus EPS estimate$0.26 next reporting period, as of 2026-08-17
Change over time is not available yet: it needs two readings of the same reporting period at least 30 days apart, and we have been recording these estimates since 2026-08-04. An estimate for a DIFFERENT quarter is not a revision, so a reading from before the last report is never compared with one after it.
The consensus estimate for the next reporting period, and how it has moved between readings of that SAME period. A change is measured only between readings estimating one period — when a company reports, the consensus moves to the next quarter and the two numbers are not comparable. Informational only, not a forecast and not advice.
Key risks (from latest filing)
["Integration risks associated with the merger of legacy TechTarget and Informa Tech Digital businesses.","Dependence on B2B technology marketing and advertising budgets, which can be volatile.","Potential failure to realize anticipated cost and revenue synergies from recent business combinations."]
What changed in the latest 10-Q
AI-assisted comparison of TTGT's 10-Q filed 2026-05-07 against the prior one filed 2025-11-10.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
- Added:
- Newer filing (2026-05-07) references Annual Report on Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 2025 (vs. 2024 in older filing)
- Newer filing states Cautionary Note is on page 35 (vs. page 44 in older filing)
- Newer filing describes company as helping 'technology companies accelerate growth' in opening sentence
- Newer filing incorporates 'formerly separate specialist brands Canalys, Wards Intelligence and Enterprise Strategy Group' under Omdia brand
- Newer filing mentions 'recent performance...impacted by subdued sales and marketing budgets...R&D activities, particularly around artificial intelligence' and management expectations for resurgence in sales/marketing activity
- Newer filing uses wording 'Informa TechTarget sits at the intersection' vs older's 'sits at the intersection'
- Newer filing expands on page count difference and structural reorganization of brand portfolio
- Removed:
- Older filing (2025-11-10) stated company was 'a leading B2B growth accelerator, informing and influencing technology buyers and sellers globally' - replaced with different opening in newer filing
- Older filing listed individual brands separately: 'Omdia, Industry Dive, NetLine, Canalys and Wards and Former TechTarget'
- Older filing mentioned 'more than 56.4 million registered members and users' as of September 30, 2025
- Older filing referenced 'rising inflation and interest rates' as specific macro-economic factors
- Older filing stated 'This provides a strong underpin' vs newer's 'This provides...underpin'
- Older filing included 'which white papers do they read, which webinars do they join, etc.' - removed in newer version
- Older filing used 'return on investment' spelled out vs newer's 'ROI' abbreviation in same context
- Older filing stated 'of the technology industry' vs newer's omission of this phrase in one location
- Reworded:
- Older: 'Informa TechTarget, together with its subsidiaries, is a leading B2B growth accelerator' → Newer: 'The Company helps technology companies accelerate growth'
- Older: 'Informa TechTarget employs expert analysts' → Newer: 'It employs expert analysts, editors and consultants'
- Older: 'challenging market strategies' → Newer: maintains same wording but context shifted
- Older: 'Omdia, Industry Dive, NetLine, Canalys and Wards and Former TechTarget are important components' → Newer: 'Through the Omdia brand, which now incorporates the formerly separate specialist brands Canalys, Wards Intelligence and Enterprise Strategy Group'
- Older: 'deliver first party data records' → Newer: removes this phrase
- Older: 'at the center of this shift in B2B buyer behavior' → Newer: 'at the center of this B2B buyer behavior' (removes 'shift')
- Older: 'with increasing scrutiny and focus on return on investment' → Newer: 'With increasing scrutiny and focus on ROI'
- Older: 'subject to the market conditions, of the technology industry' → Newer: 'subject to the market conditions of, the technology industry'
- Older: references 'rising inflation and interest rates' alongside economic uncertainty → Newer: removes these specific factors, focuses on 'economic uncertainty'
- Notes:
- Newer filing text appears truncated at 'The Informa TechTarget businesses, help both buyers of B' - full comparison of later sections not possible
- Older filing text also appears truncated - complete 'Product and service offerings' section not fully provided
- Page number changes (35 vs 44) reflect document length differences but may relate to formatting rather than content substance
- Brand reorganization under Omdia represents structural change in how portfolio is presented rather than new content addition
Risk Factors
The two filings could not be meaningfully compared for this section.
AI-assisted comparison of two SEC filing sections. It describes wording and theme changes only, makes no materiality, legal, or investment judgement, and is not financial advice. Informational only — not financial advice.
Insider activity (SEC Form 4)
0 open-market purchases and 2 open-market sales by insiders in the last 90 days.
- Last 90 days0 buys · 2 sells ($94763) — 1 selling insider
- Last 180 days0 buys · 3 sells ($189763) — 1 selling insider
Activity heuristic: net selling (a transparent product heuristic from the counts above, not a prediction or advice)
Most recent open-market transaction: 2026-06-01. As of 2026-08-24.
View full insider trading history → View SEC Form 3/4/5 filingsAsk about TTGT's insider activity →
Only open-market purchases (SEC code P) and sales (code S) are counted here. Option exercises, vesting/awards, gifts, and shares withheld for taxes are excluded — they are compensation or mechanical, not open-market conviction. Sales may be planned and non-discretionary (e.g. a Rule 10b5-1 plan) and are not necessarily bearish; open-market buying is not a recommendation to buy. Informational only — not financial advice.
Institutional ownership (13F)
4 institutional 13F filers reported holding TTGT as of 2026-03-31 (quarter-end position, filed within 45 days).
- Distinct 13F filers 4
- Reported shares held 3,219,155
- Reported value $12,490,320
reported quarterly holdings change (2025-12-31 → 2026-03-31): 0 new, 2 increased, 2 decreased, 1 exited. Change counts cover only managers that filed 13F reports in BOTH quarters, derived between two quarter-end snapshots — not same-day trades; a single manager is never said to have "bought" or "sold".
Institutional holdings are quarter-end long positions reported on SEC Form 13F-HR, filed up to 45 days after the quarter ends — they are delayed, are not real-time trades, exclude short positions and most non-US securities, and are not investment advice. Any increase/decrease is a reported change between two quarterly snapshots, not a same-day purchase or sale. These are quarter-end snapshots from the 13F filings on SEC EDGAR, filed within 45 days — not real-time, and any change is a difference between two quarterly reports, not a same-day trade. Informational only — not financial advice.
Short interest (FINRA)
TTGT had 3,506,487 shares of reported short interest as of the 2026-07-31 FINRA settlement date (delayed, bi-monthly; not real-time).
TTGT had 4.85% of its shares outstanding sold short as of the 2026-07-31 FINRA settlement date (percent of FLOAT would be higher — float is not disclosed in the source). FINRA reported 7.37 days to cover at the same settlement.
- Reported short interest (shares) 3,506,487
- Short interest (% of shares outstanding) 4.85%
- Prior settlement (shares) 3,647,534
- Reported change -3.87%
- Days to cover (reported) 7.37
Reported to FINRA as of the 2026-07-31 settlement date. Short interest is reported to FINRA and published on a delayed, bi-monthly schedule (as of a settlement date, disseminated roughly eight business days later) — it is NOT real-time, does not cover every venue or all US trading, and is not a short-squeeze prediction or investment advice. Days-to-cover is the value FINRA reports; percent of float is not shown because the source file carries no share-count denominator — where a percent appears it is of shares OUTSTANDING, the larger base, and is therefore a floor on percent of float. Informational only — not financial advice.
Competitors & peers
- ZoomInfo
- Demandbase
- 6sense
- LinkedIn Marketing Solutions (MSFT)
- Gartner (IT)
- Forrester Research (FORR)
AI-enriched competitor set. Linked names are companies covered by stocks-llm; other named peers are shown for reference only.
Compare TTGT vs…
TECHTARGET INC is found in…
Frequently asked questions
What does TECHTARGET INC (TTGT) do?
TechTarget provides marketing and sales services for business-to-business (B2B) technology companies. The company uses proprietary data, including purchase intent signals, to help technology vendors identify, engage, and convert prospects throughout their buying cycles through digital advertising, data-driven research, and content marketing platforms. Following a recent business combination, the company now integrates legacy TechTarget operations with the former Informa Tech Digital Businesses.
What sector is TECHTARGET INC (TTGT) in?
TECHTARGET INC (TTGT) is classified in the Communication Services sector. Its industry is Digital Marketing & Advertising Technology. It trades on NASDAQ.
Who are TECHTARGET INC's (TTGT) competitors?
Notable peers of TECHTARGET INC (TTGT) include ZoomInfo, Demandbase, 6sense, LinkedIn Marketing Solutions and Gartner. This peer set is informational only — not financial advice.
Is TECHTARGET INC (TTGT) overbought or oversold right now?
TECHTARGET INC (TTGT) is currently neither overbought nor oversold — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 46, in the neutral middle (as of 2026-08-21). RSI describes recent price momentum, not a forecast — informational only, not financial advice.
Where does stocks-llm's data on TTGT come from?
Fundamentals and prices come from market data, as of 2026-08-24; company filings and profile facts come from SEC EDGAR. All figures are delayed daily-close data shown with their as-of date — informational only, not financial advice.
Fundamentals: market data, as of 2026-08-24. Filings: SEC EDGAR. Prices are delayed daily-close data.
Last updated 2026-08-21.
Informational only — NOT financial advice. All figures are delayed daily-close data from SEC EDGAR & market data, shown with their as-of date.