Skip to content

Arista Networks (ANET)

Information Technology · Data Center and Enterprise Networking · NYSE

A leader in high-performance, open-standards Ethernet networking solutions powering the world's largest AI, cloud, and enterprise data centers.

What Arista Networks does

Arista Networks provides data-driven, client-to-cloud networking solutions designed for AI, data centers, and enterprise environments. The company's platform is anchored by its Extensible Operating System (EOS) and Network Data Lake (NetDL), offering a unified approach to interconnecting AI, data center, campus, and wide-area networks. Its solutions emphasize high-speed Ethernet switching, open standards, and intelligent automation to simplify network operations.

Themes: AI infrastructure, cloud networking, hyperscale data centers, network automation, Ethernet for AI (Scale Out), enterprise digital transformation

Fundamentals

  • Price$188.65 as of 2026-08-21 close
  • Market cap$237.9B as of 2026-08-21
  • 1-year return+42.9% 2025-08-21 close $132.03 → 2026-08-21 close $188.65
  • P/E63.49 as of 2026-08-24
  • Net margin+38.4% as of 2026-08-24
  • Gross margin+63.0% as of 2026-08-24
  • ROE+30.8% as of 2026-08-24
  • Debt / equity0.00 as of 2026-08-24
  • Revenue growth (YoY)+32.6% as of 2026-08-24
  • Revenue CAGR (3y)+27.1% SEC XBRL
  • Beta1.61 as of 2026-08-24
  • Last reported earnings2026-08-04 SEC EDGAR Form 8-K (Item 2.02)

Ask why ANET looks like this →

How ANET compares in its sector

  • price-to-earnings ratiomiddle range 265 covered Information Technology peers, as of 2026-08-24
  • net profit margintop 10% 405 covered Information Technology peers, as of 2026-08-24
  • operating margintop 10% 405 covered Information Technology peers, as of 2026-08-24
  • gross marginmiddle range 403 covered Information Technology peers, as of 2026-08-24
  • return on equitytop 25% 405 covered Information Technology peers, as of 2026-08-24
  • 3-year revenue CAGRtop 25% 386 covered Information Technology peers
  • free cash flow (absolute dollars, latest fiscal year)top 10% 382 covered Information Technology peers, as of FY2025

Position among covered Information Technology companies that report each metric (minimum 5 peers). A relative position within our covered catalog — not a valuation, quality, or investment judgment. A higher percentile is simply a higher value (for P/E, more expensive on earnings — never "better"). Informational only.

Ask how ANET stacks up against peers →

Top 10 scores & list membership

ANET is not currently in any published Top 10 list. Its scores are below.

Long-term score

Not scored for the long-term list: no shareholder return data.

Short-term score

61.1 #154 of 1,704 scored · #26 of 261 in Information Technology

  • Trend63.9
  • Momentum70.2
  • Setup54.5
  • Volume and participation52.0
  • Catalysts62.0

Momentum 70th: over the past 3 months this stock beat the market by 23.9 percentage points; trend 64th: a "golden cross" — its 50-day average is above its 200-day; weakest is volume and participation 52nd: it gapped 2.9% below the previous close and has not traded back through the level it left behind — an "unfilled gap", which describes a price range no trade has since crossed and is not a forecast that it will be crossed.

Scores as of 21 Aug 2026. Each bar is a percentile: how this company ranked against every company the score ranked, 0–100. A list is a published formula and its output, not a recommendation. Method version 2.

How Arista Networks looks technically

Arista Networks (ANET) is trading 26.5% above its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a longer-term uptrend. Its 50-day average crossed above its 200-day average about 272 trading days ago — a "golden cross", a bullish long-term signal. A trend is forming but not yet strong — ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 23 (a reading of 25+ marks a strong trend). Momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 52, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30). MACD, a trend-momentum gauge, turned bearish about 3 trading days ago (its momentum flipped negative). It made a new 20-day high about 8 trading days ago.

Trend

7
Distance from the 200-dayit is trading 26.5% above its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a longer-term uptrend+26.5%
50-day moving averageits average price over the last 50 trading days — a short-term trend line — is $177.36$177.36
200-day moving averageits average price over the last 200 trading days — the long-term trend line — is $149.12$149.12
Swing structureits recent peaks and dips disagree — one of them is rising while the other is not, so there is no clean up or down pattern in the swingsmixed — one of the two is not confirming
Last swing turnits last significant turn was a swing high 16 calendar days ago — the swings before that are what the structure reading is measured on16 sessions
Since the 50/200 crossits 50-day average crossed above its 200-day average about 272 trading days ago — a "golden cross", a bullish long-term signal272 sessions
Trend strength (14-day ADX)a trend is forming but not yet strong — ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 23 (a reading of 25+ marks a strong trend)22.8

Momentum

3
14-day RSImomentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 52, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30)51.7
Position in its 14-day rangeit is trading near the bottom of its 14-day range ($183.59 to $214.84) — its "stochastic" reading is 16 out of 100, where 0 would mean closing exactly at the 14-session low and 100 exactly at the high. This measures WHERE the price sits inside its recent range, which is a different question from the RSI beside it: RSI is a momentum gauge, measuring how FAST the price has been moving, so a stock can drift quietly to the bottom of its range with an ordinary RSI, or fall sharply and still sit in the middle. It has been slipping within that range over the last few sessions.16.2
Since the MACD crossed zeroMACD, a trend-momentum gauge, turned bearish about 3 trading days ago (its momentum flipped negative)3 sessions

Range

12
52-week highits highest closing price over the past year (about 252 trading days) was $214.84$214.84
From the 52-week highit is 12.2% below its 52-week high (its highest price of the past year)-12.2%
Above the 52-week lowit is 64.3% above its 52-week low (its lowest price of the past year)+64.3%
Below the 52-week highit is 12.2% below its highest point of the past year12.2%
Since a 20-day breakoutit made a new 20-day high about 8 trading days ago8 sessions
Since a 55-day breakoutit made a new 55-day high about 8 trading days ago8 sessions
All-time highits highest closing price on record is $416.20 (set on 2024-12-03)$416.20
Given back of the 52-week moveover the past year its closes ranged ($116.13 to $210.50), and it has given back roughly a quarter of its rise from last year’s low — 23% of it. Chart-watchers call 61.8%-65% given back the "golden pocket" — for this company that is $149.16 to $152.18. It is watched widely enough that orders cluster there, which is the honest reason it matters; it is not a forecast.23.1%
From the all-time highit is 54.7% below its all-time high-54.7%
Nearest price levelit is trading 4.9% above a support level at $179.44 — a price it turned at three times since 2026-04-24, most recently on 2026-07-23. Since 2024-08-21 it has 13 such levels below the current price and 0 above. Levels like these describe where the price has reversed or paused before; they are not a forecast of where it will go.-4.9%
All-time lowits lowest closing price on record is $3.28 (set on 2016-02-09)$3.28
Above the all-time lowit is 5648.8% above its all-time low+5,649%

Volatility

5
Band width vs its own 6 monthsday-to-day price swings are about average versus its own recent 6-month history61st percentile
Typical daily rangein a typical session it travels about $9.47 between its high and its low — about 5.0% of its price. That is its "average true range" over the last 14 sessions, which also counts the distance from the previous close, so a day that opens well away from yesterday counts as the large move it was$9.47
Bollinger bands (20-day, ±2σ)most of its recent trading has stayed between about $162.62 and $213.35 — the "Bollinger bands", a range drawn two standard deviations either side of its 20-day average price, which widens when the stock gets more volatile and narrows when it settles$162.62 – $187.98 – $213.35
Typical daily range (% of price)its price moves about 5.0% in a typical session — about typical for the companies we cover. This is the average gap between a session's high and low over the last 14 sessions, counting overnight moves, expressed against the current price so it can be compared with companies trading at any price5.0%
Stretch from the 200-day averageit is trading 4.2 daily ranges above its 200-day average price (26.5% above it in plain percentage terms) — a way of asking how far it has stretched from its own average in units of how far it normally moves in a day, so a calm company and a jumpy one can be compared on the same scale4.2 daily ranges above its 200-day average

Volume

1
Volume vs its 30-day averagetrading volume is about normal versus its 30-day average1.11×

Analyst

2
Change in the average price targetanalysts have raised their average price target by 1.3% since the prior reading+1.3%
Change in the consensus ratingthe analyst consensus rating has softened toward "sell" since the prior reading0.03 toward sell

Price gaps

3
Gap at the openit opened on 2026-08-21 at essentially the same price it closed at the session before — no meaningful overnight gap+0.0%
Open gapit gapped 2.9% below the previous close 3 sessions ago and has not traded back through the level it left behind at 201.8 — an "unfilled gap", which describes a price range no trade has since crossed and is not a forecast that it will be crossed-2.9%
Gap filleda 3.9% gap up opened on 2026-08-12 has been "filled" 3 sessions ago — price traded back through the level the gap left behind, and it took 4 sessions to close3 sessions ago

Price streaks

1
Closing streakit closed higher in its latest session, after a session that did not close higher — a single up day rather than a run1 session up

Relative strength

4
vs market, 1 monthover the past 1 month this stock beat the market by 5.7 percentage points (the stock gained 8.1% while the market gained 2.3%)+5.7%
vs market, 3 monthsover the past 3 months this stock beat the market by 23.9 percentage points (the stock gained 27.0% while the market gained 3.1%)+23.9%
vs market, 6 monthsover the past 6 months this stock beat the market by 31.0 percentage points (the stock gained 42.1% while the market gained 11.1%)+31.0%
vs market, 12 monthsover the past 12 months this stock beat the market by 22.4 percentage points (the stock gained 42.9% while the market gained 20.5%)+22.4%

Signal agreement

2
Bullish technical signals5 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bullish state: a "golden cross" — its 50-day average is above its 200-day, trading above its 200-day average, outperforming the market over 6 months, near the bottom of its 14-day range (oversold), trading above the Ichimoku cloud — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast5 of 9
Bearish technical signals1 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it is currently in a bearish state: MACD momentum is negative — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast1 of 9

Trend (Ichimoku cloud)

1
Vs the Ichimoku cloudtrading 9.2% above the Ichimoku cloud — a band drawn from where its own highs and lows sat up to 2026-07-16 and projected forward over today's price, the side traders read as an established uptrend, with the band below acting as the level that would have to give way. The band itself is moderate, spanning 5.5% of the share price.+9.2%

Volume-weighted price

2
Vs this year’s average price paidthe price is 23% above the average price paid so far this year, so the typical buyer over that stretch is showing a gain. That average is $153.80 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 158 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP.+22.7%
Vs the average paid since it last reportedthe price is 3% below the average price paid since it last reported on 2026-08-04 (its 8-K), so the typical buyer over that stretch is under water. That average is $195.27 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 14 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP.-3.4%

Price levels it has turned at before

ANET last closed at $188.65 on 2026-08-21. Since 2024-08-21 it has turned at 13 prices below its last close and 0 above; the 3 nearest below are listed, nearest first.

LevelSideDistanceEvidence
$179.44Support4.9% below the last closeturned there three times · 2026-04-24 to 2026-07-23
$162.47Support13.9% below the last closeturned there twice · 2025-10-10 to 2026-04-28
$156.28Support17.2% below the last closeturned there four times · 2025-09-11 to 2026-07-29

A level is a price this company reversed or paused at more than once — they describe past behaviour, not a forecast of where the price will go.

Wave structure

No Elliott-wave labelling currently fits its swings: the recent highs and lows do not satisfy the three rules a five-wave count has to obey, so there is no count to show rather than a count we are unsure about.

Read from daily closes as of 2026-08-21.

An Elliott-wave count describes the swings already printed and the level that would disprove it. It is not a forecast, a target, or advice.

Based on daily closing prices as of 2026-08-21. Describes past price behavior only — informational, not financial advice.

Ask about ANET's technicals →

Analyst consensus

  • Consensus ratingStrong Buy (1.30 mean, 1=Strong Buy…5=Strong Sell) — 27 analysts
  • Mean price target$241.82 range $185.00 – $289.00; median $248.00

Analyst estimates, as of 2026-08-17. These are third-party analyst opinions and price targets, aggregated — not a recommendation, prediction, or advice from stocks-llm. Informational only.

Analyst EPS estimate for ANET

  • Consensus EPS estimate$1.08 next reporting period, as of 2026-08-17

Change over time is not available yet: it needs two readings of the same reporting period at least 30 days apart, and we have been recording these estimates since 2026-08-04. An estimate for a DIFFERENT quarter is not a revision, so a reading from before the last report is never compared with one after it.

The consensus estimate for the next reporting period, and how it has moved between readings of that SAME period. A change is measured only between readings estimating one period — when a company reports, the consensus moves to the next quarter and the two numbers are not comparable. Informational only, not a forecast and not advice.

Ask how ANET's estimates have moved →

Key risks (from latest filing)

["Significant revenue concentration among a small number of large customers, including hyperscalers.","Exposure to supply chain constraints, particularly in memory and silicon markets.","Intense competition from large system vendors offering integrated hardware and software solutions."]

See ANET's biggest risks from its latest 10-Q →

What changed in the latest 10-Q

AI-assisted comparison of ANET's 10-Q filed 2026-05-06 against the prior one filed 2025-11-05.

Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)

  • Added:
    • Newer filing adds explicit forward-looking statements section with detailed list of risk factors, including: ability to retain customers and attract new customers including large and government customers, expectations regarding product revenue from switching and routing platforms, relationships with suppliers and partners, revenue growth expectations, sales force expansion plans, gross margin fluctuation, supply chain constraints in memory and silicon markets, non-cancellable purchase orders, competition, legal and regulatory obligations particularly related to AI/privacy/data protection/cybersecurity/environment, litigation liability beliefs, dividend policy, Santa Clara building capital expenditures, and sufficiency of cash for operations.
    • Newer filing introduces 'Centers of Data' strategy as fundamental pivot from legacy networking to unified, data-driven approach with four primary domains: AI Centers, Data Centers, Campus Centers, and WAN Centers
    • Newer filing emphasizes Network Data Lake (NetDL) as core platform component alongside EOS
    • Newer filing describes network-as-a-service approach and platform delivery across entire integrated platform
    • Newer filing states revenue percentages for customers for years ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023 rather than earlier years
  • Removed:
    • Older filing's explicit reference to 'Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 18, 2025' removed in newer filing
    • Older filing's detailed description of company as 'industry leader in data-driven, client to cloud networking for large AI, data center, campus and routing environments' replaced with different framing
    • Older filing's specific mention of 'Arista EOS, a modernized publish-subscribe state-sharing networking operating system' detailed description removed
    • Older filing's explanation of EOS combined with network applications and Ethernet switching/routing platforms using merchant silicon removed
    • Older filing's discussion of cloud computing as fundamental shift from traditional legacy network architectures removed
    • Older filing's discussion of traditional legacy IT spending comparison removed
    • Older filing's extensive discussion of VeloCloud acquisition from Broadcom in June 2025 removed in newer filing
    • Older filing's detailed AI strategy section describing two key objectives (network switching products for GPU/compute/storage interconnect and Arista AVA for AI-assisted network operations) removed
    • Older filing's specific customer identification as 'Microsoft' and 'Meta Platforms' with historical percentages (Microsoft: 20%, 18%, 16% for 2024, 2023, 2022; Meta: 15%, 21%, 26% for same years) removed
    • Older filing's discussion of long-term AI trajectory uncertainty and revenue volatility from AI infrastructure investment removed
  • Reworded:
    • Opening phrase changed from 'This discussion contains forward-looking statements' to 'This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements'
    • Forward-looking statements structure changed from brief statement to comprehensive enumerated list of specific risk factors and assumptions
    • Company description changed from 'industry leader in data-driven, client to cloud networking' to 'industry leader in data-driven, client-to-cloud networking-as-a-service'
    • Strategic differentiation framework restructured from foundational principles (reliability, open standards, automation) embedded in narrative to bullet-point list format
    • Growth strategy framing changed from emphasis on evolving/adapting to rapidly changing environment to emphasis on increasing sales in specific markets (cloud, AI, enterprise data center, campus) through platform leverage
    • Market characterization changed from 'highly competitive and characterized by rapidly changing technology' to 'characterized by rapid technological evolution, intensifying competition, and expansion of generative and agentic AI'
    • Customer concentration discussion changed from named customers (Microsoft and Meta) to unnamed 'two of our customers' with different historical year references
    • Customer concentration percentages changed for the same unnamed customers: first customer now shows 16%, 15%, 21% (vs. not named in older); second customer now shows 26%, 20%, 18% (vs. not named in older)
  • Notes:
    • The two filings cover different fiscal periods (Q1 2026 vs. Q3 2025), which may account for some content differences related to operational updates
    • The older filing text appears truncated at the end ('In some instances, such factors have had, and may continue to have, a'), preventing full comparison of the customer concentration discussion
    • Customer names were removed in newer filing but percentages suggest they refer to the same customers from older filing

Risk Factors

  • Added:
    • Added to Risks Related to Our Business and Industry (2026-05-06): 'we have entered into significant purchase commitments and are susceptible to supply shortages, extended lead times or supply changes'
    • Added to Risks Related to Supply Chain and Manufacturing (2026-05-06): 'key component supply chain constraints and inventory management' and 'we are susceptible to manufacturing delays and pricing fluctuations' and 'if demand forecasts materially change from our initial projections, we may under-or over-procure inventory that we may be unable to use in a timely manner or at all'
    • Added to Risks Related to Cybersecurity and Data Privacy (2026-05-06): bullet restructured to separate 'defects, errors or vulnerabilities in our products, services and external facing or internal network systems, or the misuse of our products or services, or those of third parties on which we rely, could lead to cybersecurity incidents or a failure to detect cybersecurity incidents, or otherwise negatively impact our business' as distinct item
    • Added to Risks Related to Accounting, Compliance, Regulation and Tax (2026-05-06): specification that compliance includes 'privacy laws, environmental laws and export controls' in expanded language
  • Removed:
    • Removed from Risks Related to Our Business and Industry (2025-11-05): 'seasonality and' before 'industry cyclicality' and 'and industry consolidation may lead to increased competition' language
    • Removed from Risks Related to Our Business and Industry (2025-11-05): 'investments in and acquisitions of complementary companies, products or technologies' changed to 'investments in and acquisitions of other businesses'
    • Removed from Risks Related to Customers and Sales (2025-11-05): 'sales of our switches generate most of our product revenue' replaced with 'inability to maintain the growth of our switching and routing platform sales, which generate most of our product revenue'
    • Removed from Risks Related to Customers and Sales (2025-11-05): reference to 'end customers' removed, now states 'some of our customers'
    • Removed from Risks Related to Products and Services (2025-11-05): 'product quality problems, defects, errors or vulnerabilities' changed to 'product or service quality problems, defects, errors or vulnerabilities'
    • Removed from Risks Related to Products and Services (2025-11-05): 'our products must interoperate' changed to 'inability to ensure that our products interoperate'
    • Removed from Risks Related to Supply Chain and Manufacturing (2025-11-05): 'insufficient component supply' changed to 'key component supply chain constraints'
    • Removed from Risks Related to Supply Chain and Manufacturing (2025-11-05): 'primarily reliant upon a predominant merchant silicon vendor' and 'we depend on third-party manufacturers to build our products' and 'future sales forecasts may materially change, which could result in incorrect levels of inventory and purchase commitments'
    • Removed from Risks Related to Intellectual Property (2025-11-05): 'failure or inability' changed to 'inability'
    • Removed separate section 'Risks Related to Litigation' (2025-11-05) containing single bullet about litigation
    • Removed from Risks Related to Cybersecurity and Data Privacy (2025-11-05): extensive language about 'create product liability risks, damage our reputation, adversely impact our operating results' and detailed consequences like 'disrupt our operations or our ability to provide services, cause vulnerabilities or perceived vulnerabilities, compromise intellectual property or other sensitive data, harm our reputation, damage customer or other relationships, delay our ability to recognize revenue, lead to significant costs, legal proceedings, legal liability, or enforcement actions'
    • Removed from Risks Related to Accounting, Compliance, Regulation and Tax (2025-11-05): 'enhanced import/export restrictions, such as enhanced export controls the U.S. has adopted targeting trade with China' changed to 'enhanced U.S. trade restrictions, affecting China and other countries'
    • Removed from Risks Related to Accounting, Compliance, Regulation and Tax (2025-11-05): 'failure to comply with government laws and regulations could harm our business' expanded to include 'including privacy laws, environmental laws and export controls could harm our business'
    • Removed from Risks Related to Accounting, Compliance, Regulation and Tax (2025-11-05): two separate bullets on 'governmental export and import controls' and 'anti-bribery and anti-corruption laws and anti-money laundering laws'
  • Reworded:
    • Risks Related to Our Business and Industry (2026-05-06): 'some of the key components' instead of 'Some key components' and 'sour ces' appears to be a typographical error in the newer filing
    • Risks Related to Our Business and Industry (2026-05-06): 'we expect large purchases by a limited number of customers to continue to represent a substantial portion of our revenue' changed from 'large purchases by a limited number of customers represent a substantial portion of our revenue'
    • Risks Related to Our Business and Industry (2026-05-06): 'countermeasures and retaliatory actions taken by other countries' simplified from 'countermeasures taken by affected countries, may have a negative effect on global economic conditions, financial markets and our business, as may retaliatory actions by other countries, including China, in response to these U.S. policies'
    • Risks Related to Our Business and Industry (2026-05-06): 'our results of operations have varied significantly from period to period and are unpredictable' changed from 'our results of operations may vary significantly from period to period and can be unpredictable'
    • Risks Related to Our Business and Industry (2026-05-06): 'we face intense competition and industry consolidation may lead to increased competition' changed from 'we face intense competition and industry consolidation'
    • Risks Related to Accounting, Compliance, Regulation and Tax (2026-05-06): 'enhanced U.S. trade restrictions, affecting China and other countries' replaces 'enhanced import/export restrictions, such as enhanced export controls the U.S. has adopted targeting trade with China'
  • Notes:
    • The newer filing text appears truncated at the end ('do not intend to pay dividends for the foreseeable futu'), making complete comparison of the final sections impossible
    • The older filing text also appears truncated ('any future decisions to reduce or discontinue repurch'), affecting comparison of the Ownership section
    • Typographical error noted in newer filing: 'sour ces' appears where 'sources' is intended in the 'sole or limited sour ces of supply' bullet

AI-assisted comparison of two SEC filing sections. It describes wording and theme changes only, makes no materiality, legal, or investment judgement, and is not financial advice. Informational only — not financial advice.

Ask what changed in ANET's latest 10-Q →

Insider activity (SEC Form 4)

0 open-market purchases and 277 open-market sales by insiders in the last 90 days.

  • Last 30 days0 buys · 149 sells ($482M) — 3 selling insiders
  • Last 90 days0 buys · 277 sells ($842M) — 4 selling insiders
  • Last 180 days0 buys · 373 sells ($1.1B) — 7 selling insiders

Activity heuristic: net selling (a transparent product heuristic from the counts above, not a prediction or advice)

Most recent open-market transaction: 2026-08-12. As of 2026-08-25.

View full insider trading history → View SEC Form 3/4/5 filings

Ask about ANET's insider activity →

Only open-market purchases (SEC code P) and sales (code S) are counted here. Option exercises, vesting/awards, gifts, and shares withheld for taxes are excluded — they are compensation or mechanical, not open-market conviction. Sales may be planned and non-discretionary (e.g. a Rule 10b5-1 plan) and are not necessarily bearish; open-market buying is not a recommendation to buy. Informational only — not financial advice.

Congressional trading disclosures

U.S. House members publicly disclose their own, their spouse's, and dependent children's stock transactions under the STOCK Act. We hold 30 matched disclosures for ANET from U.S. House Clerk Periodic Transaction Report filings.

Congressional trading disclosures →

Institutional ownership (13F)

6 institutional 13F filers reported holding ANET as of 2026-03-31 (quarter-end position, filed within 45 days).

  • Distinct 13F filers 6
  • Reported shares held 195,838,238
  • Reported value $24,045,018,799

reported quarterly holdings change (2025-12-31 → 2026-03-31): 0 new, 2 increased, 4 decreased, 0 exited. Change counts cover only managers that filed 13F reports in BOTH quarters, derived between two quarter-end snapshots — not same-day trades; a single manager is never said to have "bought" or "sold".

Institutional holdings are quarter-end long positions reported on SEC Form 13F-HR, filed up to 45 days after the quarter ends — they are delayed, are not real-time trades, exclude short positions and most non-US securities, and are not investment advice. Any increase/decrease is a reported change between two quarterly snapshots, not a same-day purchase or sale. These are quarter-end snapshots from the 13F filings on SEC EDGAR, filed within 45 days — not real-time, and any change is a difference between two quarterly reports, not a same-day trade. Informational only — not financial advice.

Ask about ANET's institutional holders →

Short interest (FINRA)

ANET had 12,815,409 shares of reported short interest as of the 2026-07-31 FINRA settlement date (delayed, bi-monthly; not real-time).

ANET had 1.02% of its shares outstanding sold short as of the 2026-07-31 FINRA settlement date (percent of FLOAT would be higher — float is not disclosed in the source). FINRA reported 1.94 days to cover at the same settlement.

  • Reported short interest (shares) 12,815,409
  • Short interest (% of shares outstanding) 1.02%
  • Prior settlement (shares) 19,887,856
  • Reported change -35.56%
  • Days to cover (reported) 1.94

Reported to FINRA as of the 2026-07-31 settlement date. Short interest is reported to FINRA and published on a delayed, bi-monthly schedule (as of a settlement date, disseminated roughly eight business days later) — it is NOT real-time, does not cover every venue or all US trading, and is not a short-squeeze prediction or investment advice. Days-to-cover is the value FINRA reports; percent of float is not shown because the source file carries no share-count denominator — where a percent appears it is of shares OUTSTANDING, the larger base, and is therefore a floor on percent of float. Informational only — not financial advice.

Ask about ANET's short interest →

Competitors & peers

AI-enriched competitor set. Linked names are companies covered by stocks-llm; other named peers are shown for reference only.

Not quite? Describe exactly what you want →

Compare ANET vs…

Arista Networks is found in…

Frequently asked questions

What does Arista Networks (ANET) do?

Arista Networks provides data-driven, client-to-cloud networking solutions designed for AI, data centers, and enterprise environments. The company's platform is anchored by its Extensible Operating System (EOS) and Network Data Lake (NetDL), offering a unified approach to interconnecting AI, data center, campus, and wide-area networks. Its solutions emphasize high-speed Ethernet switching, open standards, and intelligent automation to simplify network operations.

What sector is Arista Networks (ANET) in?

Arista Networks (ANET) is classified in the Information Technology sector. Its industry is Data Center and Enterprise Networking. It trades on NYSE.

Who are Arista Networks's (ANET) competitors?

Notable peers of Arista Networks (ANET) include Cisco Systems, Juniper Networks, NVIDIA, Extreme Networks and Hewlett Packard Enterprise. This peer set is informational only — not financial advice.

Has there been recent Congressional stock trading in ANET?

Yes — we hold 30 matched STOCK Act disclosures for ANET from U.S. House Clerk Periodic Transaction Report filings. These are legally-required disclosures (often filed 30–45 days after the trade), may belong to a U.S. House member, their spouse, or a dependent child, and are not an indicator of company performance or investment advice.

Is Arista Networks (ANET) overbought or oversold right now?

Arista Networks (ANET) is currently neither overbought nor oversold — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 52, in the neutral middle (as of 2026-08-21). RSI describes recent price momentum, not a forecast — informational only, not financial advice.

Where does stocks-llm's data on ANET come from?

Fundamentals and prices come from market data, as of 2026-08-24; company filings and profile facts come from SEC EDGAR. All figures are delayed daily-close data shown with their as-of date — informational only, not financial advice.

Fundamentals: market data, as of 2026-08-24. Filings: SEC EDGAR. Prices are delayed daily-close data.

Last updated 2026-08-21.

Informational only — NOT financial advice. All figures are delayed daily-close data from SEC EDGAR & market data, shown with their as-of date.

Research stocks in your own words.

Informational only — NOT financial advice.

ScreenersBlogPrivacyiOS app