SPRINKLR INC CLASS A (CXM)
Information Technology · Customer Experience Management (CXM) Platform · NYSE
Sprinklr offers an AI-native Unified-CXM platform that helps global enterprises manage and unify customer experiences across social, messaging, and traditional communication channels.
What SPRINKLR INC CLASS A does
Sprinklr provides a Unified Customer Experience Management (Unified-CXM) platform that helps large enterprises manage customer interactions across multiple channels and teams. The AI-native platform serves customer-facing teams from Customer Service to Marketing, enabling them to collaborate across internal silos, communicate with customers across digital and traditional channels, and leverage proprietary AI to deliver improved customer experiences at scale. The company generates revenue primarily through subscriptions to its platform and professional services, serving customers across 90+ countries spanning diverse industries including global enterprises, marketing agencies, government departments, nonprofits, and educational institutions.
Themes: customer experience management, AI-native platform, unified customer data, social media management, customer service automation, marketing automation / customer engagement, multi-channel customer communication, enterprise software
Fundamentals
- Price$7.40 as of 2026-08-21 close
- Market cap$1.6B as of 2026-08-24
- 1-year return-10.8% 2025-08-21 close $8.30 → 2026-08-21 close $7.40
- P/E57.47 as of 2026-08-24
- Net margin+3.3% as of 2026-08-24
- Gross margin+66.3% as of 2026-08-24
- ROE+5.3% as of 2026-08-24
- Debt / equity0.00 as of 2026-08-24
- Revenue growth (YoY)+8.1% as of 2026-08-24
- Revenue CAGR (3y)+11.5% SEC XBRL
- Beta0.74 as of 2026-08-24
- Last reported earnings2026-06-03 SEC EDGAR Form 8-K (Item 2.02)
How CXM compares in its sector
- price-to-earnings ratiomiddle range 265 covered Information Technology peers, as of 2026-08-24
- net profit marginmiddle range 405 covered Information Technology peers, as of 2026-08-24
- operating marginmiddle range 405 covered Information Technology peers, as of 2026-08-24
- gross marginmiddle range 403 covered Information Technology peers, as of 2026-08-24
- return on equitymiddle range 405 covered Information Technology peers, as of 2026-08-24
- 3-year revenue CAGRmiddle range 386 covered Information Technology peers
- free cash flow (absolute dollars, latest fiscal year)middle range 382 covered Information Technology peers, as of FY2026
Position among covered Information Technology companies that report each metric (minimum 5 peers). A relative position within our covered catalog — not a valuation, quality, or investment judgment. A higher percentile is simply a higher value (for P/E, more expensive on earnings — never "better"). Informational only.
How SPRINKLR INC CLASS A looks technically
SPRINKLR INC CLASS A (CXM) is trading 17.2% above its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a longer-term uptrend. Its 50-day average crossed below its 200-day average about 222 trading days ago — a "death cross", a bearish long-term signal. A strong uptrend is in place — ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 36, with buyers in control. Momentum is stretched — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 71, in overbought territory (above 70). MACD, a trend-momentum gauge, turned bullish about 3 trading days ago (its momentum flipped positive). It just made a new 20-day high, its first since 2026-01-12, pushing above its recent trading range. It is 19.6% below its highest point of the past year.
Trend
9
| Distance from the 200-day | it is trading 17.2% above its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a longer-term uptrend | +17.2% |
|---|---|---|
| 50-day moving average | its average price over the last 50 trading days — a short-term trend line — is $5.93 | $5.93 |
| 200-day moving average | its average price over the last 200 trading days — the long-term trend line — is $6.31 | $6.31 |
| Swing structure | its recent peaks and dips disagree — one of them is rising while the other is not, so there is no clean up or down pattern in the swings | mixed — one of the two is not confirming |
| Last swing turn | its last significant turn was a swing low 60 calendar days ago — the swings before that are what the structure reading is measured on | 60 sessions |
| Wave structure | its recent swings can be read as a completed three-part downward correction — a pullback in the A-B-C shape Elliott-wave chartists use; the labelling fails if price closes below 4.815. It is the only labelling that fits, though not with textbook proportions, and it describes the swings already printed, not what comes next. | possible three-wave downward correction, complete (atypical proportions) |
| Since the 50/200 cross | its 50-day average crossed below its 200-day average about 222 trading days ago — a "death cross", a bearish long-term signal | 222 sessions |
| Above the 200-day after a dip | it recently dipped to its 200-day average (the long-term trend line) and has since climbed back above it — now about 17.2% above | +17.2% |
| Trend strength (14-day ADX) | a strong uptrend is in place — ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 36, with buyers in control | 36.2 |
Momentum
3
| 14-day RSI | momentum is stretched — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 71, in overbought territory (above 70) | 71.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Position in its 14-day range | it is trading right at the top of its 14-day range ($6.38 to $7.40) — its "stochastic" reading is 100 out of 100, where 0 would mean closing exactly at the 14-session low and 100 exactly at the high. This measures WHERE the price sits inside its recent range, which is a different question from the RSI beside it: RSI is a momentum gauge, measuring how FAST the price has been moving, so a stock can drift quietly to the bottom of its range with an ordinary RSI, or fall sharply and still sit in the middle. It has been climbing within that range over the last few sessions. | 100.0 |
| Since the MACD crossed zero | MACD, a trend-momentum gauge, turned bullish about 3 trading days ago (its momentum flipped positive) | 3 sessions |
Range
12
| 52-week high | its highest closing price over the past year (about 252 trading days) was $9.20 | $9.20 |
|---|---|---|
| From the 52-week high | it is 19.6% below its 52-week high (its highest price of the past year) | -19.6% |
| Above the 52-week low | it is 56.9% above its 52-week low (its lowest price of the past year) | +57.0% |
| Below the 52-week high | it is 19.6% below its highest point of the past year | 19.6% |
| Since a 20-day breakout | it just made a new 20-day high, its first since 2026-01-12, pushing above its recent trading range | 1 session |
| Since a 55-day breakout | it just made a new 55-day high, its first since 2026-01-12, pushing above its recent trading range | 1 session |
| All-time high | its highest closing price on record is $26.50 (set on 2021-06-29) | $26.50 |
| Given back of the 52-week move | over the past year its closes ranged ($4.84 to $8.75), and it has recovered well over two thirds of its fall from last year’s high — 65% of it. Chart-watchers call 61.8%-65% given back the "golden pocket" — for this company that is $7.26 to $7.38. It is watched widely enough that orders cluster there, which is the honest reason it matters; it is not a forecast. | 65.5% |
| From the all-time high | it is 72.1% below its all-time high | -72.1% |
| Nearest price level | it is trading 2.5% below a resistance level at $7.58 — a price it turned at four times since 2024-11-18, most recently on 2025-12-23. Since 2024-08-21 it has 8 such levels below the current price and 8 above. Levels like these describe where the price has reversed or paused before; they are not a forecast of where it will go. | +2.5% |
| All-time low | its lowest closing price on record is $4.71 (set on 2026-04-23) | $4.71 |
| Above the all-time low | it is 56.9% above its all-time low | +57.0% |
Volatility
5
| Band width vs its own 6 months | day-to-day price swings are about average versus its own recent 6-month history | 63rd percentile |
|---|---|---|
| Typical daily range | in a typical session it travels about $0.2634 between its high and its low — about 3.6% of its price. That is its "average true range" over the last 14 sessions, which also counts the distance from the previous close, so a day that opens well away from yesterday counts as the large move it was | $0.2634 |
| Bollinger bands (20-day, ±2σ) | most of its recent trading has stayed between about $6.06 and $7.40 — the "Bollinger bands", a range drawn two standard deviations either side of its 20-day average price, which widens when the stock gets more volatile and narrows when it settles | $6.06 – $6.73 – $7.40 |
| Typical daily range (% of price) | its price moves about 3.6% in a typical session — about typical for the companies we cover. This is the average gap between a session's high and low over the last 14 sessions, counting overnight moves, expressed against the current price so it can be compared with companies trading at any price | 3.6% |
| Stretch from the 200-day average | it is trading 4.1 daily ranges above its 200-day average price (17.2% above it in plain percentage terms) — a way of asking how far it has stretched from its own average in units of how far it normally moves in a day, so a calm company and a jumpy one can be compared on the same scale | 4.1 daily ranges above its 200-day average |
Volume
1
| Volume vs its 30-day average | trading volume is about normal versus its 30-day average | 0.99× |
|---|
Analyst
2
| Change in the average price target | analysts' average price target is unchanged from the prior reading | 0.0% |
|---|---|---|
| Change in the consensus rating | not available for this company yet | n/a |
Candlestick patterns
1
| Since a doji | 7 sessions ago it opened and closed at almost the same price after trading through a wider range — a "doji", the classic picture of buyers and sellers finishing the session level | 7 sessions ago |
|---|
Price gaps
3
| Gap at the open | it opened on 2026-08-21 0.3% below the previous session's close — an overnight gap, the part of the move that happened while the market was shut, and traded back through that level before the close | -0.3% |
|---|---|---|
| Open gap | it gapped 2.4% above the previous close 14 sessions ago and has not traded back through the level it left behind at 6.36 — an "unfilled gap", which describes a price range no trade has since crossed and is not a forecast that it will be crossed | +2.4% |
| Gap filled | a 2.0% gap down opened on 2026-08-12 has been "filled" 6 sessions ago — price traded back through the level the gap left behind, and it took 1 session to close | 6 sessions ago |
Price streaks
1
| Closing streak | it has closed higher 4 sessions in a row, a +10.45% move over the run — an unbroken run of up days, which describes what has already happened and says nothing about the next session | 4 sessions up |
|---|
Relative strength
4
| vs market, 1 month | over the past 1 month this stock beat the market by 25.5 percentage points (the stock gained 27.8% while the market gained 2.3%) | +25.5% |
|---|---|---|
| vs market, 3 months | over the past 3 months this stock beat the market by 37.1 percentage points (the stock gained 40.2% while the market gained 3.1%) | +37.0% |
| vs market, 6 months | over the past 6 months this stock beat the market by 21.3 percentage points (the stock gained 32.4% while the market gained 11.1%) | +21.3% |
| vs market, 12 months | over the past 12 months this stock lagged the market by 31.3 percentage points (the stock lost 10.8% while the market gained 20.5%) | -31.3% |
Signal agreement
2
| Bullish technical signals | 6 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bullish state: a strong uptrend, with buyers in control, trading above its 200-day average, a fresh 20-day high, MACD momentum is positive, outperforming the market over 6 months, trading above the Ichimoku cloud — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 6 of 9 |
|---|---|---|
| Bearish technical signals | 3 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bearish state: a "death cross" — its 50-day average is below its 200-day, its RSI momentum gauge is overbought (a stretched reading), near the top of its 14-day range (overbought) — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 3 of 9 |
Trend (Ichimoku cloud)
1
| Vs the Ichimoku cloud | trading 35% above the Ichimoku cloud — a band drawn from where its own highs and lows sat up to 2026-07-16 and projected forward over today's price, the side traders read as an established uptrend, with the band below acting as the level that would have to give way. The band itself is thin, spanning 2.0% of the share price, which is taken to mean a barrier that gives way easily. | +35.1% |
|---|
Volume-weighted price
2
| Vs this year’s average price paid | the price is 30% above the average price paid so far this year, so the typical buyer over that stretch is showing a gain. That average is $5.70 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 150 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP. | +29.7% |
|---|---|---|
| Vs the average paid since it last reported | the price is 28% above the average price paid since it last reported on 2026-06-03 (its 8-K), so the typical buyer over that stretch is showing a gain. That average is $5.78 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 52 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP. | +28.1% |
Price levels it has turned at before
CXM last closed at $7.40 on 2026-08-21. Since 2024-08-21 it has turned at 8 prices below its last close and 8 above; the 3 nearest below and the 3 nearest above are listed, nearest first.
| Level | Side | Distance | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| $7.58 | Resistance | 2.5% above the last close | turned there four times · 2024-11-18 to 2025-12-23 |
| $7.12 | Support | 3.8% below the last close | turned there twice · 2024-11-05 to 2026-01-02 |
| $6.96 | Support | 6.0% below the last close | turned there twice · 2024-10-10 to 2024-10-23 |
| $7.91 | Resistance | 6.9% above the last close | turned there 7 times · 2024-09-30 to 2025-10-21 |
| $6.79 | Support | 8.2% below the last close | turned there three times · 2025-04-07 to 2025-11-21 |
| $8.11 | Resistance | 9.6% above the last close | turned there six times · 2024-09-13 to 2025-12-10 |
A level is a price this company reversed or paused at more than once — they describe past behaviour, not a forecast of where the price will go.
Wave structure
Its recent swings can be read as a three-part downward correction — the A-B-C shape chartists use for a pullback — now complete.
This labelling fails — stops being a possible reading at all — if it closes below $4.82.
It is the only labelling that fits these swings, though its proportions are not the textbook ones. It was chosen from 3 labellings that survived the rules, counting shorter readings of the same bars.
This labelling was already in place when we began recording count changes on 2026-08-13, so how long it has stood is not something we can say yet.
Read from daily closes as of 2026-08-21.
An Elliott-wave count describes the swings already printed and the level that would disprove it. It is not a forecast, a target, or advice.
Screens: Trading above the 200-day moving average · Tested and reclaimed 200-day support · Overbought (14-day RSI above 70) · Broke out to a new 20-day high · MACD just crossed bullish (12/26/9) · in a strong, established uptrend (ADX) | Learn: moving average · golden cross · adx · rsi · macd · breakout · fifty two week high low
Based on daily closing prices as of 2026-08-21. Describes past price behavior only — informational, not financial advice.
Analyst consensus
- Mean price target$7.88 range $6.00 – $12.00; median $6.75
Analyst estimates, as of 2026-08-19. These are third-party analyst opinions and price targets, aggregated — not a recommendation, prediction, or advice from stocks-llm. Informational only.
Analyst EPS estimate for CXM
- Consensus EPS estimate$0.1045 next reporting period, as of 2026-08-19
Change over time is not available yet: it needs two readings of the same reporting period at least 30 days apart, and we have been recording these estimates since 2026-08-04. An estimate for a DIFFERENT quarter is not a revision, so a reading from before the last report is never compared with one after it.
The consensus estimate for the next reporting period, and how it has moved between readings of that SAME period. A change is measured only between readings estimating one period — when a company reports, the consensus moves to the next quarter and the two numbers are not comparable. Informational only, not a forecast and not advice.
Key risks (from latest filing)
["Macroeconomic and geopolitical uncertainty may reduce enterprise IT spending and lengthen customer payment collection cycles","Competitive pressure from major cloud and CRM platforms with greater resources and existing customer relationships","Customer base consolidation reducing headcount to 1,677 customers from 1,930 year-over-year, with reliance on large customers generating significant revenue"]
What changed in the latest 10-Q
AI-assisted comparison of CXM's 10-Q filed 2026-06-04 against the prior one filed 2025-12-04.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
- Added:
- Reference to fiscal year ended January 31, 2026 and 2026 10-K filed March 19, 2026 (newer filing)
- NDE metric updated: 103.5% for 12-month period ended April 30, 2026 and 101.8% for April 30, 2025 (newer filing)
- RPO increased to $1,038.3 million and cRPO to $627.1 million as of April 30, 2026 (newer filing)
- Disclosure of 2026 Iran conflict and its impact on Middle East operations, including data center disruptions in United Arab Emirates (newer filing)
- Mention of emergency data transfers, temporary changes to data processing locations, and increased infrastructure costs related to geopolitical events (newer filing)
- Statement that platform supports over 150 languages and customers in more than 90 countries as of April 30, 2026 (newer filing)
- Removed:
- Reference to fiscal year ended January 31, 2025 and 2025 10-K filed March 21, 2025 (older filing)
- Opening statement 'Sprinklr is redefining the world's ability to make every customer experience extraordinary' (older filing)
- Reference to 145 large customers as of October 31, 2025 and 147 as of October 31, 2024 (older filing)
- NDE metric values of 102.3% for October 31, 2025 and 107.3% for October 31, 2024 (older filing)
- Explanation of NDE decrease due to 'elevated churn and down-selling of certain existing customers' (older filing)
- RPO of $857.6 million and cRPO of $562.2 million as of October 31, 2025 (older filing)
- Reference to Israel-Hamas war (older filing)
- Reference to customers in over 80 countries (older filing)
- Discussion of large customers defined as ≥$1.0 million subscription revenue (older filing)
- Section heading 'Macroeconomic Considerations' (older filing)
- Text about 'Certain prior quarterly and annual amounts have been reclassified' (older filing)
- Reworded:
- Section heading changed from 'Macroeconomic Considerations' to 'Macroeconomic and Geopolitical Considerations' (newer filing)
- Opening description changed from multi-sentence narrative about redefining customer experience to single-sentence product description: 'Sprinklr provides a Unified Customer Experience Management platform designed to help organizations manage customer interactions' (newer filing)
- Removed phrase 'seamless automation' from platform architecture description; now reads 'automation' (newer filing)
- Changed 'communicate across digital channels' to 'communicate with customers across digital and traditional channels' (newer filing)
- Removed phrase about focus 'primarily on selling to large global enterprises' and competitive advantages language (newer filing)
- Changed 'we have a highly diverse group of customers' to 'Our customer base is diverse' (newer filing)
- Removed definition and count of 'large customers' metric entirely (newer filing)
- Changed 'over 80 countries' to 'more than 90 countries' (newer filing)
- Removed 'AI-based' descriptor in reference to platform recognizing languages (newer filing)
- Added discussion of geopolitical risks including Russia-Ukraine war, 2026 Iran conflict, and military conflicts in Middle East (newer filing)
- Changed macroeconomic discussion to include geopolitical events as equal focus
- Notes:
- Older filing appears truncated at end of 'Components of Results of Operations' section; full comparison limited to available text
- Changes reflect different quarterly reporting periods (April 30, 2026 vs October 31, 2025) which accounts for some metric differences
Risk Factors
- Added:
- Added specification that AI is referred to as 'artificial intelligence ("AI")' in newer filing (2026-06-04)
- Added 'major stockholders,' to the list of entities able to exert significant control in newer filing (2026-06-04)
- Added 'or' before 'other adverse business consequences' in data privacy risk factor in newer filing (2026-06-04)
- Removed:
- Removed 'major stockholders' reference from control risk factor in older filing (2025-12-04); added back in newer filing
- Revenue figures changed: older filing (2025-12-04) cited $219.1M and $200.7M for three months ended October 31, 2025/2024 and $636.6M and $593.9M for nine months; newer filing (2026-06-04) cites $219.5M and $205.5M for three months ended April 30, 2026/2025
- Accumulated deficit figures changed: older filing (2025-12-04) showed $763.5M and $626.1M as of October 31, 2025 and January 31, 2025; newer filing (2026-06-04) shows $296.5M and $300.7M as of April 30, 2026 and January 31, 2026
- Reworded:
- Changed 'financial condition or results of operations' to 'financial condition, or results of operations' (comma addition before 'or') in introductory paragraph (2026-06-04)
- Changed 'or keep pace' to 'or keep pace' - no substantive change detected in platform development risk factor
- Changed 'or adapt' to 'or adapt' - no substantive change detected in Unified-CXM platform risk factor
- Changed 'or enforce' to 'or enforce' - no substantive change in intellectual property risk factor
- Changed 'and other adverse' to 'or other adverse' in data privacy risk factor (2026-06-04)
- Changed 'or our Unified-CXM platform,' to 'or our Unified-CXM platform,' with different punctuation in cybersecurity risk factor
- Changed 'and we may' to 'and we may' - same wording in cybersecurity liability clause
- Changed 'and their respective affiliates' to 'and their respective affiliates' in control risk factor - added 'major stockholders'
- Changed 'and share price' to 'and share price' in economic conditions risk factor
- Changed 'price our products effectively so that we are able to attract new customers and expand' to 'price our products effectively so that we are able to attract new customers, expand' (comma vs. 'and') (2026-06-04)
- Changed 'improve our gross and operating margins' added to newer filing (2026-06-04) as new objective
- Changed 'or technologies' to 'or technologies' - no substantive change
- Changed 'We have incurred significant net losses' to 'We have incurred significant net losses' in profitability risk discussion (2026-06-04)
- Changed 'while we have experienced revenue growth and profitability in recent periods' to 'While we have experienced revenue growth in recent periods and periods of profitability' in older filing (2025-12-04)
- Notes:
- The newer filing appears truncated mid-sentence ('We have expen...'), limiting full assessment of all content changes
- The older filing also appears truncated mid-sentence ('...equity and debt fi...'), limiting complete comparison
- Numerical changes in revenue and accumulated deficit figures reflect different reporting periods (April 30, 2026 vs. October 31, 2025) and are factual updates rather than substantive risk factor changes
AI-assisted comparison of two SEC filing sections. It describes wording and theme changes only, makes no materiality, legal, or investment judgement, and is not financial advice. Informational only — not financial advice.
Insider activity (SEC Form 4)
0 open-market purchases and 10 open-market sales by insiders in the last 90 days.
- Last 90 days0 buys · 10 sells ($2M) — 7 selling insiders
- Last 180 days0 buys · 10 sells ($2M) — 7 selling insiders
Activity heuristic: net selling (a transparent product heuristic from the counts above, not a prediction or advice)
Most recent open-market transaction: 2026-06-22. As of 2026-08-24.
View full insider trading history → View SEC Form 3/4/5 filingsAsk about CXM's insider activity →
Only open-market purchases (SEC code P) and sales (code S) are counted here. Option exercises, vesting/awards, gifts, and shares withheld for taxes are excluded — they are compensation or mechanical, not open-market conviction. Sales may be planned and non-discretionary (e.g. a Rule 10b5-1 plan) and are not necessarily bearish; open-market buying is not a recommendation to buy. Informational only — not financial advice.
Institutional ownership (13F)
5 institutional 13F filers reported holding CXM as of 2026-03-31 (quarter-end position, filed within 45 days).
- Distinct 13F filers 5
- Reported shares held 25,763,934
- Reported value $154,583,605
reported quarterly holdings change (2025-12-31 → 2026-03-31): 1 new, 4 increased, 0 decreased, 0 exited. Change counts cover only managers that filed 13F reports in BOTH quarters, derived between two quarter-end snapshots — not same-day trades; a single manager is never said to have "bought" or "sold".
Institutional holdings are quarter-end long positions reported on SEC Form 13F-HR, filed up to 45 days after the quarter ends — they are delayed, are not real-time trades, exclude short positions and most non-US securities, and are not investment advice. Any increase/decrease is a reported change between two quarterly snapshots, not a same-day purchase or sale. These are quarter-end snapshots from the 13F filings on SEC EDGAR, filed within 45 days — not real-time, and any change is a difference between two quarterly reports, not a same-day trade. Informational only — not financial advice.
Short interest (FINRA)
CXM had 13,273,788 shares of reported short interest as of the 2026-07-31 FINRA settlement date (delayed, bi-monthly; not real-time).
Short interest as a percent of shares outstanding is not shown for CXM because we do not hold a verified share count to divide it by. The reported figures above are unaffected.
- Reported short interest (shares) 13,273,788
- Prior settlement (shares) 14,348,124
- Reported change -7.49%
- Days to cover (reported) 4.41
Reported to FINRA as of the 2026-07-31 settlement date. Short interest is reported to FINRA and published on a delayed, bi-monthly schedule (as of a settlement date, disseminated roughly eight business days later) — it is NOT real-time, does not cover every venue or all US trading, and is not a short-squeeze prediction or investment advice. Days-to-cover is the value FINRA reports; percent of float is not shown because the source file carries no share-count denominator — where a percent appears it is of shares OUTSTANDING, the larger base, and is therefore a floor on percent of float. Informational only — not financial advice.
Competitors & peers
- Salesforce (CRM)
- Adobe (ADBE)
- Oracle (ORCL)
- HubSpot (HUBS)
- Sprout Social (SPT)
- Hootsuite
- Zendesk
AI-enriched competitor set. Linked names are companies covered by stocks-llm; other named peers are shown for reference only.
Compare CXM vs…
SPRINKLR INC CLASS A is found in…
Frequently asked questions
What does SPRINKLR INC CLASS A (CXM) do?
Sprinklr provides a Unified Customer Experience Management (Unified-CXM) platform that helps large enterprises manage customer interactions across multiple channels and teams. The AI-native platform serves customer-facing teams from Customer Service to Marketing, enabling them to collaborate across internal silos, communicate with customers across digital and traditional channels, and leverage proprietary AI to deliver improved customer experiences at scale.
What sector is SPRINKLR INC CLASS A (CXM) in?
SPRINKLR INC CLASS A (CXM) is classified in the Information Technology sector. Its industry is Customer Experience Management (CXM) Platform. It trades on NYSE.
Who are SPRINKLR INC CLASS A's (CXM) competitors?
Notable peers of SPRINKLR INC CLASS A (CXM) include Salesforce, Adobe, Oracle, HubSpot and Sprout Social. This peer set is informational only — not financial advice.
Is SPRINKLR INC CLASS A (CXM) overbought or oversold right now?
SPRINKLR INC CLASS A (CXM) is currently in overbought territory (its 14-day RSI is 71, above 70) (as of 2026-08-21). RSI describes recent price momentum, not a forecast — informational only, not financial advice.
Where does stocks-llm's data on CXM come from?
Fundamentals and prices come from market data, as of 2026-08-24; company filings and profile facts come from SEC EDGAR. All figures are delayed daily-close data shown with their as-of date — informational only, not financial advice.
Fundamentals: market data, as of 2026-08-24. Filings: SEC EDGAR. Prices are delayed daily-close data.
Last updated 2026-08-21.
Informational only — NOT financial advice. All figures are delayed daily-close data from SEC EDGAR & market data, shown with their as-of date.