Cheniere Energy (LNG)
Energy · Oil & Gas Midstream · NYSE
Cheniere Energy is a premier US-based liquefied natural gas producer that enables the export of natural gas to global energy markets.
What Cheniere Energy does
Cheniere Energy is a major liquefied natural gas (LNG) operator that liquefies natural gas for export to global markets. The company owns and operates large-scale liquefaction facilities, including trains that cool natural gas into LNG for transport, and maintains significant terminal infrastructure. Its business model involves long-term sale and purchase agreements (SPAs) and integrated production marketing (IPM) agreements.
Themes: LNG export, natural gas infrastructure, global energy markets, energy transition fuel
Fundamentals
- Price$280.79 as of 2026-08-24 close
- Market cap$58.0B as of 2026-08-24
- 1-year return+18.2% 2025-08-22 close $237.56 → 2026-08-24 close $280.79
- P/E20.81 as of 2026-08-24
- Net margin+13.6% as of 2026-08-24
- Gross margin+38.5% as of 2026-08-24
- ROE+47.4% as of 2026-08-24
- Debt / equity3.88 as of 2026-08-24
- Revenue growth (YoY)+17.5% as of 2026-08-24
- Revenue CAGR (3y)-15.8% SEC XBRL
- Beta0.33 as of 2026-08-24
- Last reported earnings2026-08-06 SEC EDGAR Form 8-K (Item 2.02)
Dividend: yield +1.0%; 4-year non-decreasing per-share dividend streak (SEC XBRL).
How LNG compares in its sector
- price-to-earnings ratiomiddle range 112 covered Energy peers, as of 2026-08-24
- net profit marginmiddle range 149 covered Energy peers, as of 2026-08-24
- operating margintop 25% 149 covered Energy peers, as of 2026-08-24
- gross marginmiddle range 142 covered Energy peers, as of 2026-08-24
- return on equitytop 10% 152 covered Energy peers, as of 2026-08-24
- 3-year revenue CAGRbottom 10% 138 covered Energy peers
- indicated dividend yieldbottom 25% 98 covered Energy peers, as of 2026-08-24
- free cash flow (absolute dollars, latest fiscal year)top 10% 95 covered Energy peers, as of FY2025
Position among covered Energy companies that report each metric (minimum 5 peers). A relative position within our covered catalog — not a valuation, quality, or investment judgment. A higher percentile is simply a higher value (for P/E, more expensive on earnings — never "better"). Informational only.
Top 10 scores & list membership
LNG is not currently in any published Top 10 list. Its scores are below.
Long-term score
51.8 #701 of 1,605 scored · #56 of 85 in Energy
Profitability 87th (return on equity 47.4%, operating margin 29.7%) and long-term trend 66th (it is 6.4% below its highest point of the past year); weakest is financial health (26th, debt to equity 3.9, free cash flow margin 10.2%).
Short-term score
47.1 #836 of 1,698 scored · #57 of 86 in Energy
Trend 70th: the price is 4% above the average price paid over the period covered, so the typical buyer over that stretch is showing a gain; catalysts 60th: analysts have raised their average price target by 0.6% since the prior reading; weakest is volume and participation 33rd: trading volume is about normal versus its 30-day average. Its score is docked 10 points for overextended (RSI above 75 or stochastic above 90).
Scores as of 24 Aug 2026. Each bar is a percentile: how this company ranked against every company the score ranked, 0–100. A list is a published formula and its output, not a recommendation. Method version 3.
Dividend coverage (FY2025)
Covered by reported results. In FY2025, LNG's dividend was covered by reported results (earnings payout 8%, free-cash-flow payout 18%). This describes past coverage, not a forecast.
- Earnings payout8% dividends / net income
- Free-cash-flow payout18% dividends / (operating cash flow − capex)
Coverage derived from reported SEC EDGAR XBRL figures for FY2025 (dividends paid vs. net income and free cash flow, same fiscal year). This describes PAST coverage for one fiscal year — it does not predict whether a dividend will be maintained, raised, or cut, and a one-year payout ratio can be distorted by non-recurring items. Informational only — not financial advice.
How Cheniere Energy looks technically
Cheniere Energy (LNG) is trading 18.7% above its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a longer-term uptrend. Its 50-day average crossed above its 200-day average about 106 trading days ago — a "golden cross", a bullish long-term signal. There is no clear trend right now — the price is choppy (ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 14, below the 25 that marks a real trend). Momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 64, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30). MACD, a trend-momentum gauge, turned bullish about 9 trading days ago (its momentum flipped positive). It just made a new 20-day high, its first since 2026-04-07, pushing above its recent trading range.
Trend
8
| Distance from the 200-day | it is trading 18.7% above its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a longer-term uptrend | +18.7% |
|---|---|---|
| 50-day moving average | its average price over the last 50 trading days — a short-term trend line — is $256.12 | $256.12 |
| 200-day moving average | its average price over the last 200 trading days — the long-term trend line — is $236.57 | $236.57 |
| Swing structure | each recent peak has been higher than the one before it and each dip has been shallower — the pattern chart-watchers call an uptrend, which describes where price has already been and not where it goes next | higher highs and higher lows |
| Last swing turn | its last significant turn was a swing low 27 calendar days ago — the swings before that are what the structure reading is measured on | 27 sessions |
| Wave structure | its recent swings can be read as a five-part upward sequence — what Elliott-wave chartists call an impulse — now in leg 3 of five; the labelling fails if price closes below 249.611. It is one of several labellings that fit, and it describes the swings already printed, not what comes next. The same swings also read as a three-part correction in leg C. | possible upward five-wave sequence, in wave 3 (one of several readings) |
| Since the 50/200 cross | its 50-day average crossed above its 200-day average about 106 trading days ago — a "golden cross", a bullish long-term signal | 106 sessions |
| Trend strength (14-day ADX) | there is no clear trend right now — the price is choppy (ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 14, below the 25 that marks a real trend) | 14.3 |
Momentum
3
| 14-day RSI | momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 64, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30) | 63.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Position in its 14-day range | it is trading right at the top of its 14-day range ($253.97 to $281.74) — its "stochastic" reading is 97 out of 100, where 0 would mean closing exactly at the 14-session low and 100 exactly at the high. This measures WHERE the price sits inside its recent range, which is a different question from the RSI beside it: RSI is a momentum gauge, measuring how FAST the price has been moving, so a stock can drift quietly to the bottom of its range with an ordinary RSI, or fall sharply and still sit in the middle. It has been climbing within that range over the last few sessions. | 96.6 |
| Since the MACD crossed zero | MACD, a trend-momentum gauge, turned bullish about 9 trading days ago (its momentum flipped positive) | 9 sessions |
Range
12
| 52-week high | its highest closing price over the past year (about 252 trading days) was $300.10 | $300.10 |
|---|---|---|
| From the 52-week high | it is 6.4% below its 52-week high (its highest price of the past year) | -6.4% |
| Above the 52-week low | it is 50.8% above its 52-week low (its lowest price of the past year) | +50.8% |
| Below the 52-week high | it is 6.4% below its highest point of the past year | 6.4% |
| Since a 20-day breakout | it just made a new 20-day high, its first since 2026-04-07, pushing above its recent trading range | 1 session |
| Since a 55-day breakout | it just made a new 55-day high, its first since 2026-04-07, pushing above its recent trading range | 1 session |
| All-time high | its highest closing price on record is $300.10 (set on 2026-03-30) | $300.10 |
| Given back of the 52-week move | over the past year its closes ranged ($188.83 to $296.91), and it has given back only a small part of its rise from last year’s low — 15% of it. Chart-watchers call 61.8%-65% given back the "golden pocket" — for this company that is $226.66 to $230.12. It is watched widely enough that orders cluster there, which is the honest reason it matters; it is not a forecast. | 14.9% |
| From the all-time high | it is 6.4% below its all-time high | -6.4% |
| Nearest price level | it is trading 1.6% above a support level at $276.17 — a price it turned at twice since 2026-04-30, most recently on 2026-07-24. Since 2024-08-26 it has 15 such levels below the current price and 1 above. Levels like these describe where the price has reversed or paused before; they are not a forecast of where it will go. | -1.6% |
| All-time low | its lowest closing price on record is $0.95 (set on 2008-10-15) | $0.95 |
| Above the all-time low | it is 29456.8% above its all-time low | +29,457% |
Volatility
5
| Band width vs its own 6 months | day-to-day price swings are about average versus its own recent 6-month history | 37th percentile |
|---|---|---|
| Typical daily range | in a typical session it travels about $7.10 between its high and its low — about 2.5% of its price. That is its "average true range" over the last 14 sessions, which also counts the distance from the previous close, so a day that opens well away from yesterday counts as the large move it was | $7.10 |
| Bollinger bands (20-day, ±2σ) | most of its recent trading has stayed between about $249.18 and $282.25 — the "Bollinger bands", a range drawn two standard deviations either side of its 20-day average price, which widens when the stock gets more volatile and narrows when it settles | $249.18 – $265.71 – $282.25 |
| Typical daily range (% of price) | its price moves about 2.5% in a typical session — calmer than most companies we cover. This is the average gap between a session's high and low over the last 14 sessions, counting overnight moves, expressed against the current price so it can be compared with companies trading at any price | 2.5% |
| Stretch from the 200-day average | it is trading 6.2 daily ranges above its 200-day average price (18.7% above it in plain percentage terms) — a way of asking how far it has stretched from its own average in units of how far it normally moves in a day, so a calm company and a jumpy one can be compared on the same scale | 6.2 daily ranges above its 200-day average |
Volume
1
| Volume vs its 30-day average | trading volume is about normal versus its 30-day average | 0.70× |
|---|
Analyst
2
| Change in the average price target | analysts have raised their average price target by 0.6% since the prior reading | +0.6% |
|---|---|---|
| Change in the consensus rating | the analyst consensus rating is unchanged since the prior reading | unchanged |
Candlestick patterns
2
| Since a doji | 3 sessions ago it opened and closed at almost the same price after trading through a wider range — a "doji", the classic picture of buyers and sellers finishing the session level | 3 sessions ago |
|---|---|---|
| Since a bullish engulfing | 8 sessions ago it opened below the previous session's close and finished above that session's open — a "bullish engulfing" pair, where one up day more than undid the down day before it | 8 sessions ago |
Price gaps
2
| Gap at the open | it opened on 2026-08-24 0.3% above the previous session's close — an overnight gap, the part of the move that happened while the market was shut, and traded back through that level before the close | +0.3% |
|---|---|---|
| Gap filled | a 2.3% gap up opened on 2026-07-29 has been "filled" 14 sessions ago — price traded back through the level the gap left behind, and it took 4 sessions to close | 14 sessions ago |
Price streaks
1
| Closing streak | it closed higher in its latest session, after a session that did not close higher — a single up day rather than a run | 1 session up |
|---|
Relative strength
4
| vs market, 1 month | over the past 1 month this stock beat the market by 0.8 percentage points (the stock gained 4.1% while the market gained 3.3%) | +0.8% |
|---|---|---|
| vs market, 3 months | over the past 3 months this stock beat the market by 14.2 percentage points (the stock gained 16.6% while the market gained 2.4%) | +14.2% |
| vs market, 6 months | over the past 6 months this stock beat the market by 16.0 percentage points (the stock gained 27.1% while the market gained 11.1%) | +16.0% |
| vs market, 12 months | over the past 12 months this stock lagged the market by 0.1 percentage points (the stock gained 18.2% while the market gained 18.3%) | -0.1% |
Signal agreement
2
| Bullish technical signals | 6 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bullish state: a "golden cross" — its 50-day average is above its 200-day, trading above its 200-day average, a fresh 20-day high, MACD momentum is positive, outperforming the market over 6 months, trading above the Ichimoku cloud — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 6 of 9 |
|---|---|---|
| Bearish technical signals | 1 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it is currently in a bearish state: near the top of its 14-day range (overbought) — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 1 of 9 |
Trend (Ichimoku cloud)
1
| Vs the Ichimoku cloud | trading 12% above the Ichimoku cloud — a band drawn from where its own highs and lows sat up to 2026-07-17 and projected forward over today's price, the side traders read as an established uptrend, with the band below acting as the level that would have to give way. The band itself is thin, spanning 0.6% of the share price, which is taken to mean a barrier that gives way easily. | +11.7% |
|---|
Volume-weighted price
2
| Vs this year’s average price paid | the price is 12% above the average price paid so far this year, so the typical buyer over that stretch is showing a gain. That average is $249.60 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 159 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP. | +12.5% |
|---|---|---|
| Vs the average paid since it last reported | the price is 4% above the average price paid since it last reported on 2026-08-06 (its 10-Q), so the typical buyer over that stretch is showing a gain. That average is $269.45 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 13 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP. | +4.2% |
Price levels it has turned at before
LNG last closed at $280.79 on 2026-08-24. Since 2024-08-26 it has turned at 15 prices below its last close and 1 above; the 3 nearest below and the nearest above are listed, nearest first.
| Level | Side | Distance | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| $276.17 | Support | 1.6% below the last close | turned there twice · 2026-04-30 to 2026-07-24 |
| $299.80 | Resistance | 6.8% above the last close | turned there twice · 2026-03-19 to 2026-03-30 |
| $258.44 | Support | 8.0% below the last close | turned there twice · 2025-01-17 to 2026-03-06 |
| $251.79 | Support | 10.3% below the last close | turned there three times · 2026-05-20 to 2026-07-28 |
A level is a price this company reversed or paused at more than once — they describe past behaviour, not a forecast of where the price will go.
Wave structure
Its recent swings can be read as a five-part upward sequence — what Elliott-wave chartists call an impulse — now in leg 3 of five.
This labelling fails — stops being a possible reading at all — if it closes below $249.61.
This is one of several labellings that fit the same swings, so treat it as a reading rather than the reading. It was chosen from 2 labellings that survived the rules, counting shorter readings of the same bars.
On past moves of this shape the leg has usually ended somewhere between $302.81 and $335.69 — that is where it has tended to end if the count holds, not a forecast of where the price goes.
Alternate reading: The same swings also read as a three-part correction in leg C, which fails on a close below $249.61.
This labelling was already in place when we began recording count changes on 2026-08-13, so how long it has stood is not something we can say yet.
Read from daily closes as of 2026-08-24.
An Elliott-wave count describes the swings already printed and the level that would disprove it. It is not a forecast, a target, or advice.
Screens: Trading above the 200-day moving average · Broke out to a new 20-day high · trendless / choppy (low ADX) · beating the market · Stretched far above its 200-day average (6+ daily ranges) · At the top of its 14-day range (stochastic above 80) | Learn: moving average · golden cross · adx · rsi · macd · breakout
Based on daily closing prices as of 2026-08-24. Describes past price behavior only — informational, not financial advice.
Analyst consensus
- Consensus ratingStrong Buy (1.43 mean, 1=Strong Buy…5=Strong Sell) — 22 analysts
- Mean price target$306.73 range $255.00 – $340.00; median $305.50
Analyst estimates, as of 2026-08-22. These are third-party analyst opinions and price targets, aggregated — not a recommendation, prediction, or advice from stocks-llm. Informational only.
Analyst EPS estimate for LNG
- Consensus EPS estimate$4.68 next reporting period, as of 2026-08-22
Change over time is not available yet: it needs two readings of the same reporting period at least 30 days apart, and we have been recording these estimates since 2026-08-04. An estimate for a DIFFERENT quarter is not a revision, so a reading from before the last report is never compared with one after it.
The consensus estimate for the next reporting period, and how it has moved between readings of that SAME period. A change is measured only between readings estimating one period — when a company reports, the consensus moves to the next quarter and the two numbers are not comparable. Informational only, not a forecast and not advice.
Key risks (from latest filing)
["Volatility in global LNG and natural gas prices could impact revenue and profitability.","Reliance on regulatory approvals from agencies like FERC and the DOE for project development and operations.","Exposure to significant debt obligations associated with capital-intensive infrastructure projects."]
What changed in the latest 10-Q
AI-assisted comparison of LNG's 10-Q filed 2026-05-07 against the prior one filed 2025-10-30.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
- Added:
- Newer filing references 'annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025' (filed 2026-05-07)
- Removed:
- Older filing referenced 'annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 and our quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2025' (filed 2025-10-30)
- Reworded:
- As of March 31, 2026 (newer) vs. As of September 30, 2025 (older) - updated reporting date reference
- Approximately 8 mtpa was under construction (newer) vs. over 12 mtpa was under construction (older) - reduced construction capacity figure
- Were the largest producer (newer, past tense framing) vs. We are the largest producer (older, present tense) - slight tense change in status description
- Notes:
- Text of older filing appears truncated at end, but the sections compared are substantially complete for both filings
Risk Factors
- Added:
- Added 'DAP' definition: 'delivered at place, which requires the buyer to take delivery at one or more designated receiving terminals' (2026-05-07 filing)
- Added financial data for three months ended March 31, 2026 in Consolidated Statements of Operations (2026-05-07 filing)
- Added financial data for March 31, 2026 in Consolidated Balance Sheets (2026-05-07 filing)
- Added footnote explaining January 2026 redemption of redeemable NCI in Gregory Power Plant VIE (2026-05-07 filing)
- Added specific VIE asset and liability amounts of $16.6 billion and $17.0 billion as of March 31, 2026 (2026-05-07 filing)
- Removed:
- Removed 'CAMT' definition: 'corporate alternative minimum tax' (present in 2025-10-30 filing)
- Removed nine-month comparative financial data from Consolidated Statements of Operations (2025-10-30 filing showed three and nine month periods; 2026-05-07 filing shows only three months ended March 31)
- Removed September 30, 2024 comparative balance sheet data (2025-10-30 filing showed September 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024; 2026-05-07 filing shows March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025)
- Removed nine months ended September 30 statement of operations data (2025-10-30 filing)
- Removed reference to 'substantially all of which are related to CQP' language regarding VIE balances (2025-10-30 filing); replaced with 'all of which were related to CQP' (2026-05-07 filing)
- Reworded:
- Changed abbreviated legal entity structure reference date from 'September 30, 2025' to 'March 31, 2026' (2026-05-07 filing)
- Changed 'free trade agreement providing for national treatment for trade in natural gas' from 'with the United States' to 'with the U.S.' in FTA countries definition (2026-05-07 filing)
- Changed 'generally accepted accounting principles in the United States' to 'generally accepted accounting principles in the U.S.' in GAAP definition (2026-05-07 filing)
- Changed 'countries with which the United States does not have' to 'countries with which the U.S. does not have' in non-FTA countries definition (2026-05-07 filing)
- Changed VIE reference from 'consolidated variable interest entities ("VIEs"), substantially all of which are related to CQP' to 'consolidated variable interest entities ("VIE") that owns the Gregory Power Plant' (2026-05-07 filing)
- Notes:
- The newer filing appears to contain only the first portion of financial statements and does not show complete Risk Factors section text, making a full comparison of Item 1A. Risk Factors impossible
- Page numbering differs between filings (Risk Factors listed as page 38 in 2026-05-07 filing versus page 42 in 2025-10-30 filing), suggesting document structure changes
- The older filing shows September 30 period-end data while newer filing shows March 31 period-end data, reflecting different quarterly reporting dates
AI-assisted comparison of two SEC filing sections. It describes wording and theme changes only, makes no materiality, legal, or investment judgement, and is not financial advice. Informational only — not financial advice.
Insider activity (SEC Form 4)
No open-market insider purchases or sales recorded in the last 90 days.
- Last 180 days0 buys · 1 sell ($9M) — 1 selling insider
Most recent open-market transaction: 2026-03-30. As of 2026-08-25.
View full insider trading history → View SEC Form 3/4/5 filingsAsk about LNG's insider activity →
Only open-market purchases (SEC code P) and sales (code S) are counted here. Option exercises, vesting/awards, gifts, and shares withheld for taxes are excluded — they are compensation or mechanical, not open-market conviction. Sales may be planned and non-discretionary (e.g. a Rule 10b5-1 plan) and are not necessarily bearish; open-market buying is not a recommendation to buy. Informational only — not financial advice.
Congressional trading disclosures
U.S. House members publicly disclose their own, their spouse's, and dependent children's stock transactions under the STOCK Act. We hold 4 matched disclosures for LNG from U.S. House Clerk Periodic Transaction Report filings.
Congressional trading disclosures →Institutional ownership (13F)
6 institutional 13F filers reported holding LNG as of 2026-03-31 (quarter-end position, filed within 45 days).
- Distinct 13F filers 6
- Reported shares held 29,690,380
- Reported value $8,424,942,460
reported quarterly holdings change (2025-12-31 → 2026-03-31): 0 new, 5 increased, 1 decreased, 0 exited. Change counts cover only managers that filed 13F reports in BOTH quarters, derived between two quarter-end snapshots — not same-day trades; a single manager is never said to have "bought" or "sold".
Institutional holdings are quarter-end long positions reported on SEC Form 13F-HR, filed up to 45 days after the quarter ends — they are delayed, are not real-time trades, exclude short positions and most non-US securities, and are not investment advice. Any increase/decrease is a reported change between two quarterly snapshots, not a same-day purchase or sale. These are quarter-end snapshots from the 13F filings on SEC EDGAR, filed within 45 days — not real-time, and any change is a difference between two quarterly reports, not a same-day trade. Informational only — not financial advice.
Short interest (FINRA)
LNG had 3,771,454 shares of reported short interest as of the 2026-07-31 FINRA settlement date (delayed, bi-monthly; not real-time).
LNG had 1.83% of its shares outstanding sold short as of the 2026-07-31 FINRA settlement date (percent of FLOAT would be higher — float is not disclosed in the source). FINRA reported 2.24 days to cover at the same settlement.
- Reported short interest (shares) 3,771,454
- Short interest (% of shares outstanding) 1.83%
- Prior settlement (shares) 4,232,389
- Reported change -10.89%
- Days to cover (reported) 2.24
Reported to FINRA as of the 2026-07-31 settlement date. Short interest is reported to FINRA and published on a delayed, bi-monthly schedule (as of a settlement date, disseminated roughly eight business days later) — it is NOT real-time, does not cover every venue or all US trading, and is not a short-squeeze prediction or investment advice. Days-to-cover is the value FINRA reports; percent of float is not shown because the source file carries no share-count denominator — where a percent appears it is of shares OUTSTANDING, the larger base, and is therefore a floor on percent of float. Informational only — not financial advice.
Competitors & peers
- Freeport LNG
- Tellurian (TELL)
- Sempra Infrastructure (SRE)
- Venture Global LNG
- New Fortress Energy (NFE)
AI-enriched competitor set. Linked names are companies covered by stocks-llm; other named peers are shown for reference only.
Compare LNG vs…
Cheniere Energy is found in…
Frequently asked questions
What does Cheniere Energy (LNG) do?
Cheniere Energy is a major liquefied natural gas (LNG) operator that liquefies natural gas for export to global markets. The company owns and operates large-scale liquefaction facilities, including trains that cool natural gas into LNG for transport, and maintains significant terminal infrastructure. Its business model involves long-term sale and purchase agreements (SPAs) and integrated production marketing (IPM) agreements.
What sector is Cheniere Energy (LNG) in?
Cheniere Energy (LNG) is classified in the Energy sector. Its industry is Oil & Gas Midstream. It trades on NYSE.
Does LNG pay a dividend?
Yes — Cheniere Energy (LNG) pays a dividend, with an indicated yield of about 0.97% and 4-year non-decreasing per-share dividend streak (SEC EDGAR XBRL) (market data, as of 2026-08-24). Informational only — not financial advice.
Who are Cheniere Energy's (LNG) competitors?
Notable peers of Cheniere Energy (LNG) include Freeport LNG, Tellurian, Sempra Infrastructure, Venture Global LNG and New Fortress Energy. This peer set is informational only — not financial advice.
Has there been recent Congressional stock trading in LNG?
Yes — we hold 4 matched STOCK Act disclosures for LNG from U.S. House Clerk Periodic Transaction Report filings. These are legally-required disclosures (often filed 30–45 days after the trade), may belong to a U.S. House member, their spouse, or a dependent child, and are not an indicator of company performance or investment advice.
Is Cheniere Energy (LNG) overbought or oversold right now?
Cheniere Energy (LNG) is currently neither overbought nor oversold — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 64, in the neutral middle (as of 2026-08-24). RSI describes recent price momentum, not a forecast — informational only, not financial advice.
Where does stocks-llm's data on LNG come from?
Fundamentals and prices come from market data, as of 2026-08-24; company filings and profile facts come from SEC EDGAR. All figures are delayed daily-close data shown with their as-of date — informational only, not financial advice.
Fundamentals: market data, as of 2026-08-24. Filings: SEC EDGAR. Prices are delayed daily-close data.
Last updated 2026-08-24.
Informational only — NOT financial advice. All figures are delayed daily-close data from SEC EDGAR & market data, shown with their as-of date.