Skip to content

Q2 HOLDINGS INC (QTWO)

Information Technology · financial technology software · NYSE

Q2 Holdings provides a comprehensive cloud-based digital transformation platform that powers digital banking and lending experiences for financial institutions and fintechs.

What Q2 HOLDINGS INC does

Q2 Holdings provides a cloud-based digital banking and lending platform for financial institutions and financial services companies. Its solutions enable customers to deliver secure, branded digital banking experiences, including digital account opening, lending, and fraud protection, to their end users.

Themes: digital banking transformation, fintech software, cloud banking, AI-driven fraud prevention

Fundamentals

  • Price$63.91 as of 2026-08-21 close
  • Market cap$4.0B as of 2026-08-21
  • 1-year return-15.5% 2025-08-21 close $75.64 → 2026-08-21 close $63.91
  • P/E44.89 as of 2026-08-24
  • Net margin+10.9% as of 2026-08-24
  • Gross margin+57.0% as of 2026-08-24
  • ROE+14.5% as of 2026-08-24
  • Debt / equity0.00 as of 2026-08-24
  • Revenue growth (YoY)+13.9% as of 2026-08-24
  • Revenue CAGR (3y)+12.0% SEC XBRL
  • Beta1.35 as of 2026-08-24
  • Last reported earnings2026-07-29 SEC EDGAR Form 8-K (Item 2.02)

Ask why QTWO looks like this →

How QTWO compares in its sector

  • price-to-earnings ratiomiddle range 265 covered Information Technology peers, as of 2026-08-24
  • net profit marginmiddle range 405 covered Information Technology peers, as of 2026-08-24
  • operating marginmiddle range 405 covered Information Technology peers, as of 2026-08-24
  • gross marginmiddle range 403 covered Information Technology peers, as of 2026-08-24
  • return on equitymiddle range 405 covered Information Technology peers, as of 2026-08-24
  • 3-year revenue CAGRmiddle range 386 covered Information Technology peers
  • free cash flow (absolute dollars, latest fiscal year)middle range 382 covered Information Technology peers, as of FY2025

Position among covered Information Technology companies that report each metric (minimum 5 peers). A relative position within our covered catalog — not a valuation, quality, or investment judgment. A higher percentile is simply a higher value (for P/E, more expensive on earnings — never "better"). Informational only.

Ask how QTWO stacks up against peers →

Top 10 scores & list membership

QTWO is not currently in any published Top 10 list. Its scores are below.

Long-term score

Not scored for the long-term list: no shareholder return data.

Short-term score

53.9 #548 of 1,704 scored · #77 of 261 in Information Technology

  • Trend69.1
  • Momentum62.3
  • Setup55.7
  • Volume and participation26.1
  • Catalysts45.6

Trend 69th: a strong uptrend, with buyers in control; momentum 62nd: over the past 3 months this stock beat the market by 32.7 percentage points; weakest is volume and participation 26th: trading volume is unusually light — only about 47% of its 30-day average.

Scores as of 21 Aug 2026. Each bar is a percentile: how this company ranked against every company the score ranked, 0–100. A list is a published formula and its output, not a recommendation. Method version 2.

How Q2 HOLDINGS INC looks technically

Q2 HOLDINGS INC (QTWO) is trading 11.5% above its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a longer-term uptrend. Its 50-day average crossed below its 200-day average about 263 trading days ago — a "death cross", a bearish long-term signal. A strong uptrend is in place — ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 35, with buyers in control. Momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 62, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30). MACD, a trend-momentum gauge, turned bearish about 5 trading days ago (its momentum flipped negative). It made a new 20-day high about 7 trading days ago. It is 25.0% below its highest point of the past year. Day-to-day price swings are unusually narrow versus its own recent history — a "Bollinger squeeze" (in the tightest 6% of the past ~6 months), which often precedes a bigger move.

Trend

9
Distance from the 200-dayit is trading 11.5% above its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a longer-term uptrend+11.5%
50-day moving averageits average price over the last 50 trading days — a short-term trend line — is $54.77$54.77
200-day moving averageits average price over the last 200 trading days — the long-term trend line — is $57.32$57.32
Swing structureeach recent peak has been higher than the one before it and each dip has been shallower — the pattern chart-watchers call an uptrend, which describes where price has already been and not where it goes nexthigher highs and higher lows
Last swing turnits last significant turn was a swing high 7 calendar days ago — the swings before that are what the structure reading is measured on7 sessions
Wave structureits recent swings can be read as a completed three-part upward correction — a pullback in the A-B-C shape Elliott-wave chartists use; the labelling fails if price closes above 66.995. It is one of several labellings that fit, and it describes the swings already printed, not what comes next. The same swings also read as a five-part sequence in leg 4.possible three-wave upward correction, complete (one of several readings)
Since the 50/200 crossits 50-day average crossed below its 200-day average about 263 trading days ago — a "death cross", a bearish long-term signal263 sessions
Above the 200-day after a dipit recently dipped to its 200-day average (the long-term trend line) and has since climbed back above it — now about 11.5% above+11.5%
Trend strength (14-day ADX)a strong uptrend is in place — ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 35, with buyers in control35.3

Momentum

3
14-day RSImomentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 62, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30)61.9
Position in its 14-day rangeit is trading around the middle of its 14-day range ($61.02 to $67.00) — its "stochastic" reading is 48 out of 100, where 0 would mean closing exactly at the 14-session low and 100 exactly at the high. This measures WHERE the price sits inside its recent range, which is a different question from the RSI beside it: RSI is a momentum gauge, measuring how FAST the price has been moving, so a stock can drift quietly to the bottom of its range with an ordinary RSI, or fall sharply and still sit in the middle. It has been slipping within that range over the last few sessions.48.4
Since the MACD crossed zeroMACD, a trend-momentum gauge, turned bearish about 5 trading days ago (its momentum flipped negative)5 sessions

Range

12
52-week highits highest closing price over the past year (about 252 trading days) was $85.19$85.19
From the 52-week highit is 25.0% below its 52-week high (its highest price of the past year)-25.0%
Above the 52-week lowit is 56.7% above its 52-week low (its lowest price of the past year)+56.7%
Below the 52-week highit is 25.0% below its highest point of the past year25.0%
Since a 20-day breakoutit made a new 20-day high about 7 trading days ago7 sessions
Since a 55-day breakoutit made a new 55-day high about 7 trading days ago7 sessions
All-time highits highest closing price on record is $148.56 (set on 2021-02-10)$148.56
Given back of the 52-week moveover the past year its closes ranged ($42.09 to $84.24), and it has recovered around half of its fall from last year’s high — 52% of it. Chart-watchers call 61.8%-65% given back the "golden pocket" — for this company that is $68.14 to $69.49. It is watched widely enough that orders cluster there, which is the honest reason it matters; it is not a forecast.51.8%
From the all-time highit is 57.0% below its all-time high-57.0%
Nearest price levelit is trading 0.8% above a support level at $63.41 — a price it turned at three times since 2025-04-07, most recently on 2026-01-20. Since 2024-08-21 it has 6 such levels below the current price and 9 above. Levels like these describe where the price has reversed or paused before; they are not a forecast of where it will go.-0.8%
All-time lowits lowest closing price on record is $9.62 (set on 2014-05-09)$9.62
Above the all-time lowit is 564.3% above its all-time low+564.4%

Volatility

5
Band width vs its own 6 monthsday-to-day price swings are unusually narrow versus its own recent history — a "Bollinger squeeze" (in the tightest 6% of the past ~6 months), which often precedes a bigger move6th percentile
Typical daily rangein a typical session it travels about $2.53 between its high and its low — about 4.0% of its price. That is its "average true range" over the last 14 sessions, which also counts the distance from the previous close, so a day that opens well away from yesterday counts as the large move it was$2.53
Bollinger bands (20-day, ±2σ)most of its recent trading has stayed between about $58.61 and $66.73 — the "Bollinger bands", a range drawn two standard deviations either side of its 20-day average price, which widens when the stock gets more volatile and narrows when it settles$58.61 – $62.67 – $66.73
Typical daily range (% of price)its price moves about 4.0% in a typical session — about typical for the companies we cover. This is the average gap between a session's high and low over the last 14 sessions, counting overnight moves, expressed against the current price so it can be compared with companies trading at any price4.0%
Stretch from the 200-day averageit is trading 2.6 daily ranges above its 200-day average price (11.5% above it in plain percentage terms) — a way of asking how far it has stretched from its own average in units of how far it normally moves in a day, so a calm company and a jumpy one can be compared on the same scale2.6 daily ranges above its 200-day average

Volume

1
Volume vs its 30-day averagetrading volume is about normal versus its 30-day average0.82×

Analyst

2
Change in the average price targetanalysts' average price target is unchanged from the prior reading0.0%
Change in the consensus ratingthe analyst consensus rating is unchanged since the prior readingunchanged

Candlestick patterns

1
Since a bearish engulfing3 sessions ago it opened above the previous session's close and finished below that session's open — a "bearish engulfing" pair, where one down day more than undid the up day before it3 sessions ago

Price gaps

3
Gap at the openit opened on 2026-08-21 0.6% below the previous session's close — an overnight gap, the part of the move that happened while the market was shut, and traded back through that level before the close-0.6%
Open gapit gapped 2.4% above the previous close 19 sessions ago and has not traded back through the level it left behind at 54.61 — an "unfilled gap", which describes a price range no trade has since crossed and is not a forecast that it will be crossed+2.4%
Gap filleda 2.1% gap down opened on 2026-08-12 has been "filled" 6 sessions ago — price traded back through the level the gap left behind, and it took 1 session to close6 sessions ago

Price streaks

1
Closing streakit closed higher in its latest session, after a session that did not close higher — a single up day rather than a run1 session up

Relative strength

4
vs market, 1 monthover the past 1 month this stock beat the market by 13.6 percentage points (the stock gained 15.9% while the market gained 2.3%)+13.6%
vs market, 3 monthsover the past 3 months this stock beat the market by 35.0 percentage points (the stock gained 38.1% while the market gained 3.1%)+35.0%
vs market, 6 monthsover the past 6 months this stock beat the market by 14.8 percentage points (the stock gained 25.9% while the market gained 11.1%)+14.8%
vs market, 12 monthsover the past 12 months this stock lagged the market by 36.0 percentage points (the stock lost 15.5% while the market gained 20.5%)-36.0%

Signal agreement

2
Bullish technical signals4 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bullish state: a strong uptrend, with buyers in control, trading above its 200-day average, outperforming the market over 6 months, trading above the Ichimoku cloud — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast4 of 9
Bearish technical signals2 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bearish state: a "death cross" — its 50-day average is below its 200-day, MACD momentum is negative — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast2 of 9

Trend (Ichimoku cloud)

1
Vs the Ichimoku cloudtrading 27% above the Ichimoku cloud — a band drawn from where its own highs and lows sat up to 2026-07-16 and projected forward over today's price, the side traders read as an established uptrend, with the band below acting as the level that would have to give way. The band itself is moderate, spanning 3.5% of the share price.+26.5%

Volume-weighted price

2
Vs this year’s average price paidthe price is 20% above the average price paid so far this year, so the typical buyer over that stretch is showing a gain. That average is $53.41 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 158 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP.+19.6%
Vs the average paid since it last reportedthe price is 2% above the average price paid since it last reported on 2026-07-29 (its 10-Q), so the typical buyer over that stretch is showing a gain. That average is $62.51 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 18 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP.+2.2%

Price levels it has turned at before

QTWO last closed at $63.91 on 2026-08-21. Since 2024-08-21 it has turned at 6 prices below its last close and 9 above; the 3 nearest below and the 3 nearest above are listed, nearest first.

LevelSideDistanceEvidence
$63.41Support0.8% below the last closeturned there three times · 2025-04-07 to 2026-01-20
$69.01Resistance8.0% above the last closeturned there four times · 2024-09-11 to 2026-01-26
$72.95Resistance14.1% above the last closeturned there twice · 2025-08-12 to 2025-12-16
$54.40Support14.9% below the last closeturned there three times · 2026-02-04 to 2026-05-04
$52.83Support17.3% below the last closeturned there twice · 2026-03-10 to 2026-06-01
$76.42Resistance19.6% above the last closeturned there five times · 2024-09-26 to 2025-12-22

A level is a price this company reversed or paused at more than once — they describe past behaviour, not a forecast of where the price will go.

Wave structure

Its recent swings can be read as a three-part upward correction — the A-B-C shape chartists use for a pullback — now complete.

This labelling fails — stops being a possible reading at all — if it closes above $67.00.

This is one of several labellings that fit the same swings, so treat it as a reading rather than the reading. It was chosen from 2 labellings that survived the rules, counting shorter readings of the same bars.

Alternate reading: The same swings also read as a five-part sequence in leg 4, which fails on a close below $56.83.

This reading has stood for 6 trading days, since 2026-08-14.

Read from daily closes as of 2026-08-21.

An Elliott-wave count describes the swings already printed and the level that would disprove it. It is not a forecast, a target, or advice.

Based on daily closing prices as of 2026-08-21. Describes past price behavior only — informational, not financial advice.

Ask about QTWO's technicals →

Analyst consensus

  • Consensus ratingBuy (1.58 mean, 1=Strong Buy…5=Strong Sell) — 11 analysts
  • Mean price target$74.36 range $60.00 – $82.00; median $75.00

Analyst estimates, as of 2026-08-23. These are third-party analyst opinions and price targets, aggregated — not a recommendation, prediction, or advice from stocks-llm. Informational only.

Analyst EPS estimate for QTWO

  • Consensus EPS estimate$0.6856 next reporting period, as of 2026-08-23

Change over time is not available yet: it needs two readings of the same reporting period at least 30 days apart, and we have been recording these estimates since 2026-08-04. An estimate for a DIFFERENT quarter is not a revision, so a reading from before the last report is never compared with one after it.

The consensus estimate for the next reporting period, and how it has moved between readings of that SAME period. A change is measured only between readings estimating one period — when a company reports, the consensus moves to the next quarter and the two numbers are not comparable. Informational only, not a forecast and not advice.

Ask how QTWO's estimates have moved →

Key risks (from latest filing)

["Cybersecurity threats, financial transaction fraud, and data privacy breaches.","Dependence on the financial services industry, which is subject to economic volatility, consolidation, and regulatory changes.","Challenges in managing growth and the complexity of implementing solutions for large customers."]

See QTWO's biggest risks from its latest 10-Q →

What changed in the latest 10-Q

AI-assisted comparison of QTWO's 10-Q filed 2026-04-29 against the prior one filed 2025-11-05.

Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)

  • Added:
    • Reference to fiscal year ended December 31, 2025 and Form 10-K filed February 11, 2026 (newer filing dated 2026-04-29)
    • Discussion of 'risk and fraud solutions' as standalone offering
    • Phrase 'account holders and retail and commercial End Users' added to describe customer base
    • Statement about 'Digital financial services are highly regulated, subject to extensive and evolving supervisory, consumer protection, privacy and third-party risk management requirements'
    • Reference to 'unified, cloud-based software platform purpose-built for the complex, regulated financial services industry'
    • Phrase 'Our platform architecture supports modular innovation and enables customers and partners to deploy new capabilities efficiently while maintaining operational resilience and compliance'
    • Discussion of 'advancements in data analytics, automation, and AI' driving industry transformation
    • Phrase 'modern, fast, flexible technology platforms that can support innovation while meeting stringent regulatory, security and resiliency requirements'
  • Removed:
    • Reference to fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 and Form 10-K filed February 12, 2025 (older filing dated 2025-11-05)
    • Phrase 'broad market acceptance of our solutions' (changed to 'broad market adoption')
    • Description of Q2 Innovation Studio as 'leverages Q2's open technology platform to enable a partnership ecosystem, allowing the design, development and distribution of innovative products, services, features and integrations on Q2's digital banking platform'
    • Explicit mention of 'Helix serves as a cloud-native core and banking as a service, or BaaS, solution' in overview section
    • Phrase 'purpose-build our platforms and solutions to enable success for our customers and partners by allowing them to digitize their operations and offerings, differentiate their digital brands, integrate traditional and emerging financial services and ultimately, enhance their End-User acquisition, engagement and retention and improve their operational efficiencies and profitability'
    • Phrase 'This integrated approach allows our customers to deliver unified and robust financial experiences across digital channels' (word 'robust' removed)
    • Reference to 'our data center and cloud-based hosting infrastructure and resources are designed to comply'
  • Reworded:
    • Changed 'broad market acceptance' to 'broad market adoption' in newer filing
    • Changed 'engage with End Users' to 'engage with account holders and retail and commercial End Users' in Overview section
    • Restructured description of solutions portfolio - moved explicit Helix and Q2 Innovation Studio details from Overview to later in section
    • Added more detailed technical platform description in newer filing regarding modular innovation and operational resilience
    • Changed description of financial services transformation to include 'advancements in data analytics, automation, and AI are increasing the importance of modern, fast, flexible technology platforms' (not in older filing)
  • Notes:
    • Text appears truncated at end of both filings; full revenue recognition language not visible for comparison
    • Some structural reorganization of content occurred between filings, making direct line-by-line comparison challenging

Risk Factors

  • Added:
    • Added bullet point on AI risks: 'the risks associated with recent advances in artificial intelligence, or AI, including the increasing availability of more capable AI models to the public that may further enhance the ability of threat actors to identify, develop and exploit vulnerabilities, automate certain aspects of cyberattacks and conduct more targeted or scalable social engineering or fraud schemes' (filed 2026-04-29)
    • Added reference to 'the war in Iran' in geopolitical instability bullet point (filed 2026-04-29)
    • Added 'our use of AI tools and solutions' to the AI development risk factor (filed 2026-04-29)
    • Added 'and go-lives' to the implementation timing risk factor (filed 2026-04-29)
    • Added new bullet point: 'the risks and challenges around increased regulatory scrutiny and evolving requirements for money movement services and the resulting potential higher costs, increased complexity and limitations on offerings on our business and financial results' (filed 2026-04-29)
  • Removed:
    • Removed opening bullet point about 'continued uncertainty regarding U.S. tariffs and trade measures and resulting market volatility' that appeared first in older filing (filed 2025-11-05)
    • Removed bullet point on 'litigation related to intellectual property and other matters and any related claims, negotiations and settlements' (filed 2025-11-05)
    • Removed bullet point on 'the risks associated with further consolidation in the financial services industry' (filed 2025-11-05)
    • Removed bullet point on 'the risks associated with selling our solutions internationally and with the continued expansion of our international operations' (filed 2025-11-05)
    • Removed bullet point on 'the risk that our debt repayment obligations may adversely affect our financial condition and that we may not be able to obtain capital when desired or needed on favorable terms' (filed 2025-11-05)
  • Reworded:
    • Reordered tariff/trade language from first bullet point to later bullet point combined with other market volatility risks (filed 2026-04-29)
    • Changed 'elevated and fluctuating interest rates' to 'fluctuating interest rates' in economic challenges bullet (filed 2026-04-29)
    • Changed 'artificial intelligence, or AI, based solutions, our AI and data strategies and solutions' to 'AI based solutions, our AI and data strategies and solutions, our use of AI tools and solutions' (filed 2026-04-29)
    • Changed 'may provide more complex revenue arrangements' to 'may include more complex revenue arrangements' in FinTech/Alt-Fi risk factor (filed 2026-04-29)
    • Changed 'the impact that the timing of bookings may have' to 'the impact that the timing of bookings and go-lives may have' (filed 2026-04-29)
    • Changed 'the migration of a significant portion of the computing, storage and processing' to 'the migration of the computing, storage and processing' in cloud migration risk factor (filed 2026-04-29)
    • Changed 'including defects, failures, interruptions, or disruptions' to 'including defects, failures, interruptions or disruptions' (comma removal in third-party partnership risk) (filed 2026-04-29)
  • Notes:
    • The newer filing text appears truncated at 'liti' suggesting the risk factors section continues beyond the provided excerpt
    • The page numbering differs between filings (Item 1A on page 42 in newer vs. page 45 in older), indicating structural or formatting changes
    • Both filings contain forward-looking statement disclaimers with substantially similar language but the risk factor substance differs significantly

AI-assisted comparison of two SEC filing sections. It describes wording and theme changes only, makes no materiality, legal, or investment judgement, and is not financial advice. Informational only — not financial advice.

Ask what changed in QTWO's latest 10-Q →

Insider activity (SEC Form 4)

0 open-market purchases and 4 open-market sales by insiders in the last 90 days.

  • Last 30 days0 buys · 2 sells ($6M) — 2 selling insiders
  • Last 90 days0 buys · 4 sells ($7M) — 3 selling insiders
  • Last 180 days0 buys · 6 sells ($7M) — 4 selling insiders

Activity heuristic: net selling (a transparent product heuristic from the counts above, not a prediction or advice)

Most recent open-market transaction: 2026-08-13. As of 2026-08-24.

View full insider trading history → View SEC Form 3/4/5 filings

Ask about QTWO's insider activity →

Only open-market purchases (SEC code P) and sales (code S) are counted here. Option exercises, vesting/awards, gifts, and shares withheld for taxes are excluded — they are compensation or mechanical, not open-market conviction. Sales may be planned and non-discretionary (e.g. a Rule 10b5-1 plan) and are not necessarily bearish; open-market buying is not a recommendation to buy. Informational only — not financial advice.

Institutional ownership (13F)

6 institutional 13F filers reported holding QTWO as of 2026-03-31 (quarter-end position, filed within 45 days).

  • Distinct 13F filers 6
  • Reported shares held 13,279,727
  • Reported value $628,131,070

reported quarterly holdings change (2025-12-31 → 2026-03-31): 0 new, 5 increased, 1 decreased, 0 exited. Change counts cover only managers that filed 13F reports in BOTH quarters, derived between two quarter-end snapshots — not same-day trades; a single manager is never said to have "bought" or "sold".

Institutional holdings are quarter-end long positions reported on SEC Form 13F-HR, filed up to 45 days after the quarter ends — they are delayed, are not real-time trades, exclude short positions and most non-US securities, and are not investment advice. Any increase/decrease is a reported change between two quarterly snapshots, not a same-day purchase or sale. These are quarter-end snapshots from the 13F filings on SEC EDGAR, filed within 45 days — not real-time, and any change is a difference between two quarterly reports, not a same-day trade. Informational only — not financial advice.

Ask about QTWO's institutional holders →

Short interest (FINRA)

QTWO had 4,528,831 shares of reported short interest as of the 2026-07-31 FINRA settlement date (delayed, bi-monthly; not real-time).

QTWO had 7.26% of its shares outstanding sold short as of the 2026-07-31 FINRA settlement date (percent of FLOAT would be higher — float is not disclosed in the source). FINRA reported 3.87 days to cover at the same settlement.

  • Reported short interest (shares) 4,528,831
  • Short interest (% of shares outstanding) 7.26%
  • Prior settlement (shares) 4,275,884
  • Reported change 5.92%
  • Days to cover (reported) 3.87

Reported to FINRA as of the 2026-07-31 settlement date. Short interest is reported to FINRA and published on a delayed, bi-monthly schedule (as of a settlement date, disseminated roughly eight business days later) — it is NOT real-time, does not cover every venue or all US trading, and is not a short-squeeze prediction or investment advice. Days-to-cover is the value FINRA reports; percent of float is not shown because the source file carries no share-count denominator — where a percent appears it is of shares OUTSTANDING, the larger base, and is therefore a floor on percent of float. Informational only — not financial advice.

Ask about QTWO's short interest →

Competitors & peers

AI-enriched competitor set. Linked names are companies covered by stocks-llm; other named peers are shown for reference only.

Not quite? Describe exactly what you want →

Compare QTWO vs…

Frequently asked questions

What does Q2 HOLDINGS INC (QTWO) do?

Q2 Holdings provides a cloud-based digital banking and lending platform for financial institutions and financial services companies. Its solutions enable customers to deliver secure, branded digital banking experiences, including digital account opening, lending, and fraud protection, to their end users.

What sector is Q2 HOLDINGS INC (QTWO) in?

Q2 HOLDINGS INC (QTWO) is classified in the Information Technology sector. Its industry is financial technology software. It trades on NYSE.

Who are Q2 HOLDINGS INC's (QTWO) competitors?

Notable peers of Q2 HOLDINGS INC (QTWO) include Jack Henry & Associates, FIS, Fiserv, nCino and Temenos. This peer set is informational only — not financial advice.

Is Q2 HOLDINGS INC (QTWO) overbought or oversold right now?

Q2 HOLDINGS INC (QTWO) is currently neither overbought nor oversold — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 62, in the neutral middle (as of 2026-08-21). RSI describes recent price momentum, not a forecast — informational only, not financial advice.

Where does stocks-llm's data on QTWO come from?

Fundamentals and prices come from market data, as of 2026-08-24; company filings and profile facts come from SEC EDGAR. All figures are delayed daily-close data shown with their as-of date — informational only, not financial advice.

Fundamentals: market data, as of 2026-08-24. Filings: SEC EDGAR. Prices are delayed daily-close data.

Last updated 2026-08-21.

Informational only — NOT financial advice. All figures are delayed daily-close data from SEC EDGAR & market data, shown with their as-of date.

Research stocks in your own words.

Informational only — NOT financial advice.

ScreenersBlogPrivacyiOS app