Schneider National (SNDR)
Industrials · trucking and logistics · NYSE
A leading provider of truckload, intermodal, and logistics services with a vast asset-based and third-party network.
What Schneider National does
Schneider National provides a broad portfolio of transportation and logistics services, including truckload, intermodal, and third-party logistics (3PL) solutions. The company operates through a network of company-owned assets and partner carriers to manage supply chain, distribution, and freight transportation needs.
Themes: logistics / supply chain management, freight transportation, intermodal rail transport, dedicated trucking services
Fundamentals
- Price$35.82 as of 2026-08-21 close
- Market cap$6.4B as of 2026-08-24
- 1-year return+46.6% 2025-08-21 close $24.43 → 2026-08-21 close $35.82
- P/E57.11 as of 2026-08-24
- Net margin+1.9% as of 2026-08-24
- Gross margin+43.3% as of 2026-08-24
- ROE+3.7% as of 2026-08-24
- Debt / equity0.13 as of 2026-08-24
- Revenue growth (YoY)+6.3% as of 2026-08-24
- Revenue CAGR (3y)-4.9% SEC XBRL
- Beta1.23 as of 2026-08-24
- Last reported earnings2026-07-30 SEC EDGAR Form 8-K (Item 2.02)
Dividend: yield +1.6%; at least 5 years of non-decreasing per-share dividends (SEC XBRL) — we do not hold the year before it, so the real streak may be longer.
How SNDR compares in its sector
- price-to-earnings ratiotop 25% 357 covered Industrials peers, as of 2026-08-24
- net profit marginmiddle range 457 covered Industrials peers, as of 2026-08-24
- operating marginmiddle range 457 covered Industrials peers, as of 2026-08-24
- gross margintop 25% 455 covered Industrials peers, as of 2026-08-24
- return on equitymiddle range 460 covered Industrials peers, as of 2026-08-24
- 3-year revenue CAGRbottom 25% 426 covered Industrials peers
- indicated dividend yieldmiddle range 267 covered Industrials peers, as of 2026-08-24
- free cash flow (absolute dollars, latest fiscal year)middle range 414 covered Industrials peers, as of FY2025
Position among covered Industrials companies that report each metric (minimum 5 peers). A relative position within our covered catalog — not a valuation, quality, or investment judgment. A higher percentile is simply a higher value (for P/E, more expensive on earnings — never "better"). Informational only.
Top 10 scores & list membership
SNDR is not currently in any published Top 10 list. Its scores are below.
Long-term score
41.7 #778 of 987 scored · #155 of 197 in Industrials
Capital return 71st (consecutive years of dividend increases 5 years) and long-term trend 67th (trading above its 200-day average); weakest is profitability (11th, operating margin 3%, return on equity 3.7%).
Short-term score
44.4 #1165 of 1,704 scored · #174 of 283 in Industrials
Trend 47th: a "golden cross" — its 50-day average is above its 200-day; catalysts 46th: the analyst consensus rating is unchanged since the prior reading; weakest is volume and participation 41st: trading volume is about normal versus its 30-day average.
Scores as of 21 Aug 2026. Each bar is a percentile: how this company ranked against every company the score ranked, 0–100. A list is a published formula and its output, not a recommendation. Method version 2.
Dividend coverage (FY2025)
Covered by reported results. In FY2025, SNDR's dividend was covered by reported results (earnings payout 65%, free-cash-flow payout 23%). This describes past coverage, not a forecast.
- Earnings payout65% dividends / net income
- Free-cash-flow payout23% dividends / (operating cash flow − capex)
Coverage derived from reported SEC EDGAR XBRL figures for FY2025 (dividends paid vs. net income and free cash flow, same fiscal year). This describes PAST coverage for one fiscal year — it does not predict whether a dividend will be maintained, raised, or cut, and a one-year payout ratio can be distorted by non-recurring items. Informational only — not financial advice.
How Schneider National looks technically
Schneider National (SNDR) is trading 20.1% above its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a longer-term uptrend. Its 50-day average crossed above its 200-day average about 159 trading days ago — a "golden cross", a bullish long-term signal. There is no clear trend right now — the price is choppy (ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 16, below the 25 that marks a real trend). Momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 50, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30). MACD, a trend-momentum gauge, turned bearish about 4 trading days ago (its momentum flipped negative). It made a new 20-day low about 17 trading days ago. Day-to-day price swings are unusually narrow versus its own recent history — a "Bollinger squeeze" (in the tightest 1% of the past ~6 months), which often precedes a bigger move.
Trend
8
| Distance from the 200-day | it is trading 20.1% above its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a longer-term uptrend | +20.1% |
|---|---|---|
| 50-day moving average | its average price over the last 50 trading days — a short-term trend line — is $36.32 | $36.32 |
| 200-day moving average | its average price over the last 200 trading days — the long-term trend line — is $29.82 | $29.82 |
| Swing structure | its recent peaks and dips disagree — one of them is rising while the other is not, so there is no clean up or down pattern in the swings | mixed — one of the two is not confirming |
| Last swing turn | its last significant turn was a swing high 7 calendar days ago — the swings before that are what the structure reading is measured on | 7 sessions |
| Wave structure | its recent swings can be read as a completed three-part upward correction — a pullback in the A-B-C shape Elliott-wave chartists use; the labelling fails if price closes above 36.705. It is the only labelling that fits, and it describes the swings already printed, not what comes next. | possible three-wave upward correction, complete |
| Since the 50/200 cross | its 50-day average crossed above its 200-day average about 159 trading days ago — a "golden cross", a bullish long-term signal | 159 sessions |
| Trend strength (14-day ADX) | there is no clear trend right now — the price is choppy (ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 16, below the 25 that marks a real trend) | 16.3 |
Momentum
3
| 14-day RSI | momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 50, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30) | 49.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Position in its 14-day range | it is trading in the upper half of its 14-day range ($34.44 to $36.88) — its "stochastic" reading is 57 out of 100, where 0 would mean closing exactly at the 14-session low and 100 exactly at the high. This measures WHERE the price sits inside its recent range, which is a different question from the RSI beside it: RSI is a momentum gauge, measuring how FAST the price has been moving, so a stock can drift quietly to the bottom of its range with an ordinary RSI, or fall sharply and still sit in the middle. It has been climbing within that range over the last few sessions. | 56.6 |
| Since the MACD crossed zero | MACD, a trend-momentum gauge, turned bearish about 4 trading days ago (its momentum flipped negative) | 4 sessions |
Range
12
| 52-week high | its highest closing price over the past year (about 252 trading days) was $39.24 | $39.24 |
|---|---|---|
| From the 52-week high | it is 8.7% below its 52-week high (its highest price of the past year) | -8.7% |
| Above the 52-week low | it is 78.1% above its 52-week low (its lowest price of the past year) | +78.1% |
| Below the 52-week high | it is 8.7% below its highest point of the past year | 8.7% |
| Since a 20-day breakout | it made a new 20-day low about 17 trading days ago | 17 sessions |
| Since a 55-day breakout | it made a new 55-day high about 51 trading days ago | 51 sessions |
| All-time high | its highest closing price on record is $39.24 (set on 2026-07-23) | $39.24 |
| Given back of the 52-week move | over the past year its closes ranged ($20.25 to $38.76), and it has given back roughly a quarter of its rise from last year’s low — 16% of it. Chart-watchers call 61.8%-65% given back the "golden pocket" — for this company that is $26.73 to $27.32. It is watched widely enough that orders cluster there, which is the honest reason it matters; it is not a forecast. | 15.9% |
| From the all-time high | it is 8.7% below its all-time high | -8.7% |
| Nearest price level | it is trading 2.7% below a resistance level at $36.79 — a price it turned at twice since 2026-08-05, most recently on 2026-08-14. Since 2024-08-21 it has 11 such levels below the current price and 2 above. Levels like these describe where the price has reversed or paused before; they are not a forecast of where it will go. | +2.7% |
| All-time low | its lowest closing price on record is $15.36 (set on 2020-03-12) | $15.36 |
| Above the all-time low | it is 133.2% above its all-time low | +133.2% |
Volatility
5
| Band width vs its own 6 months | day-to-day price swings are unusually narrow versus its own recent history — a "Bollinger squeeze" (in the tightest 1% of the past ~6 months), which often precedes a bigger move | 1st percentile |
|---|---|---|
| Typical daily range | in a typical session it travels about $1.15 between its high and its low — about 3.2% of its price. That is its "average true range" over the last 14 sessions, which also counts the distance from the previous close, so a day that opens well away from yesterday counts as the large move it was | $1.15 |
| Bollinger bands (20-day, ±2σ) | most of its recent trading has stayed between about $34.31 and $36.96 — the "Bollinger bands", a range drawn two standard deviations either side of its 20-day average price, which widens when the stock gets more volatile and narrows when it settles | $34.31 – $35.63 – $36.96 |
| Typical daily range (% of price) | its price moves about 3.2% in a typical session — about typical for the companies we cover. This is the average gap between a session's high and low over the last 14 sessions, counting overnight moves, expressed against the current price so it can be compared with companies trading at any price | 3.2% |
| Stretch from the 200-day average | it is trading 5.2 daily ranges above its 200-day average price (20.1% above it in plain percentage terms) — a way of asking how far it has stretched from its own average in units of how far it normally moves in a day, so a calm company and a jumpy one can be compared on the same scale | 5.2 daily ranges above its 200-day average |
Volume
1
| Volume vs its 30-day average | trading volume is about normal versus its 30-day average | 0.56× |
|---|
Analyst
2
| Change in the average price target | analysts' average price target is unchanged from the prior reading | 0.0% |
|---|---|---|
| Change in the consensus rating | the analyst consensus rating is unchanged since the prior reading | unchanged |
Candlestick patterns
2
| Since a doji | 5 sessions ago it opened and closed at almost the same price after trading through a wider range — a "doji", the classic picture of buyers and sellers finishing the session level | 5 sessions ago |
|---|---|---|
| Since a bullish engulfing | 7 sessions ago it opened below the previous session's close and finished above that session's open — a "bullish engulfing" pair, where one up day more than undid the down day before it | 7 sessions ago |
Price gaps
3
| Gap at the open | it opened on 2026-08-21 1.2% above the previous session's close — an overnight gap, the part of the move that happened while the market was shut, and had not traded back through that level by the close | +1.2% |
|---|---|---|
| Open gap | it gapped 3.6% above the previous close 15 sessions ago and has not traded back through the level it left behind at 34.14 — an "unfilled gap", which describes a price range no trade has since crossed and is not a forecast that it will be crossed | +3.6% |
| Gap filled | a 3.5% gap down opened on 2026-06-11 has been "filled" 48 sessions ago — price traded back through the level the gap left behind, and it took 1 session to close | 48 sessions ago |
Price streaks
1
| Closing streak | it has closed higher 2 sessions in a row, a +2.37% move over the run — an unbroken run of up days, which describes what has already happened and says nothing about the next session | 2 sessions up |
|---|
Relative strength
4
| vs market, 1 month | over the past 1 month this stock lagged the market by 9.0 percentage points (the stock lost 6.7% while the market gained 2.3%) | -9.0% |
|---|---|---|
| vs market, 3 months | over the past 3 months this stock beat the market by 4.3 percentage points (the stock gained 7.4% while the market gained 3.1%) | +4.3% |
| vs market, 6 months | over the past 6 months this stock beat the market by 11.1 percentage points (the stock gained 22.2% while the market gained 11.1%) | +11.2% |
| vs market, 12 months | over the past 12 months this stock beat the market by 26.1 percentage points (the stock gained 46.6% while the market gained 20.5%) | +26.1% |
Signal agreement
2
| Bullish technical signals | 3 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bullish state: a "golden cross" — its 50-day average is above its 200-day, trading above its 200-day average, outperforming the market over 6 months — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 3 of 9 |
|---|---|---|
| Bearish technical signals | 1 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it is currently in a bearish state: MACD momentum is negative — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast | 1 of 9 |
Trend (Ichimoku cloud)
1
| Vs the Ichimoku cloud | trading inside the Ichimoku cloud — a band drawn from where its own highs and lows sat up to 2026-07-16 and projected forward over today's price, the zone traders read as unresolved — neither side has established a trend, and the band is where that gets settled. The band itself is thick, spanning 8.7% of the share price, which is taken to mean a barrier that has held for a while and takes effort to cross. | 0.0% |
|---|
Volume-weighted price
2
| Vs this year’s average price paid | the price is 14% above the average price paid so far this year, so the typical buyer over that stretch is showing a gain. That average is $31.50 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 155 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP. | +13.7% |
|---|---|---|
| Vs the average paid since it last reported | the price is 1% above the average price paid since it last reported on 2026-07-30 (its 8-K), so the typical buyer over that stretch is showing a gain. That average is $35.49 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 17 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP. | +0.9% |
Price levels it has turned at before
SNDR last closed at $35.82 on 2026-08-21. Since 2024-08-21 it has turned at 11 prices below its last close and 2 above; the 3 nearest below and the 2 nearest above are listed, nearest first.
| Level | Side | Distance | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| $36.79 | Resistance | 2.7% above the last close | turned there twice · 2026-08-05 to 2026-08-14 |
| $34.82 | Support | 2.8% below the last close | turned there three times · 2026-06-24 to 2026-08-12 |
| $33.64 | Support | 6.1% below the last close | turned there three times · 2024-11-29 to 2026-07-30 |
| $39.14 | Resistance | 9.3% above the last close | turned there twice · 2026-06-08 to 2026-07-23 |
| $30.86 | Support | 13.8% below the last close | turned there four times · 2025-01-06 to 2026-02-12 |
A level is a price this company reversed or paused at more than once — they describe past behaviour, not a forecast of where the price will go.
Wave structure
Its recent swings can be read as a three-part upward correction — the A-B-C shape chartists use for a pullback — now complete.
This labelling fails — stops being a possible reading at all — if it closes above $36.70.
It is the only labelling that fits these swings, though its proportions are not the textbook ones. It was chosen from 3 labellings that survived the rules, counting shorter readings of the same bars.
This reading has stood for 1 trading day, since 2026-08-21.
Read from daily closes as of 2026-08-21.
An Elliott-wave count describes the swings already printed and the level that would disprove it. It is not a forecast, a target, or advice.
Screens: Trading above the 200-day moving average · MACD just crossed bearish (12/26/9) · in a Bollinger Band volatility squeeze · trendless / choppy (low ADX) · beating the market · Trading inside the Ichimoku cloud | Learn: moving average · golden cross · adx · rsi · macd · breakout · bollinger bands
Based on daily closing prices as of 2026-08-21. Describes past price behavior only — informational, not financial advice.
Analyst consensus
- Consensus ratingBuy (2.44 mean, 1=Strong Buy…5=Strong Sell) — 14 analysts
- Mean price target$37.50 range $32.00 – $45.00; median $37.00
Analyst estimates, as of 2026-08-24. These are third-party analyst opinions and price targets, aggregated — not a recommendation, prediction, or advice from stocks-llm. Informational only.
Analyst EPS estimate for SNDR
- Consensus EPS estimate$0.3039 next reporting period, as of 2026-08-24
Change over time is not available yet: it needs two readings of the same reporting period at least 30 days apart, and we have been recording these estimates since 2026-08-04. An estimate for a DIFFERENT quarter is not a revision, so a reading from before the last report is never compared with one after it.
The consensus estimate for the next reporting period, and how it has moved between readings of that SAME period. A change is measured only between readings estimating one period — when a company reports, the consensus moves to the next quarter and the two numbers are not comparable. Informational only, not a forecast and not advice.
Key risks (from latest filing)
["Cyclicality of the trucking industry and driver shortages","Dependence on railroads for intermodal operations","Fluctuations in fuel prices and potential inability to recover costs through surcharges"]
What changed in the latest 10-Q
AI-assisted comparison of SNDR's 10-Q filed 2026-05-01 against the prior one filed 2025-10-30.
Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)
- Added:
- Newer filing (2026-05-01) references Annual Report on Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 2025 (vs. 2024 in older filing)
- Newer filing adds phrase 'and experienced management and operations teams' in acquisition strategy description
- Newer filing specifies 'company-employed drivers operating company-owned equipment' more explicitly than older version
- Newer filing includes phrase 'with most drayage services performed by company drivers, supplemented by third-party drayage capacity' for intermodal operations
- Enterprise Summary table in newer filing (2026-05-01) shows three-month period ended March 31, 2026 vs. 2025 only (vs. nine-month and three-month comparisons in older filing)
- Newer filing shows operating revenues of $1,398.5M and $1,401.8M for Q1 2026 and Q1 2025 respectively
- Newer filing shows adjusted EBITDA of $143.6M and $154.8M for Q1 2026 and Q1 2025 respectively
- Newer filing shows free cash flow of $48.1M and ($5.4M) for Q1 2026 and Q1 2025 respectively
- Removed:
- Older filing (2025-10-30) includes nine-month ended September 30 data for 2025 and 2024; newer filing does not include nine-month data
- Older filing includes three-month comparison for September 30, 2025 vs. 2024; newer filing uses March 31 period instead
- Older filing shows operating revenues of $1,452.4M and $1,315.7M for Q3 2025 and Q3 2024; newer filing shows different quarterly period
- Older filing shows adjusted EBITDA of $148.9M and $143.8M for Q3 2025 and Q3 2024; newer filing shows different amounts for different period
- Older filing uses phrase 'continually monitor' vs. newer filing 'continuously monitor'
- Older filing describes operations team without including 'management' explicitly in the team description
- Older filing describes intermodal services using 'dray' vs. newer filing 'drayage'
- Reworded:
- Newer filing: 'designed to maximize returns' vs. older filing: 'seeks to maximize returns'
- Newer filing: 'We continuously monitor' vs. older filing: 'We continually monitor'
- Newer filing: 'experienced management and operations teams' vs. older filing: 'experienced operations team'
- Newer filing: 'our company-employed drivers operating company-owned equipment' vs. older filing: 'our company-employed drivers in company trucks'
- Newer filing: 'freight is transported and delivered' vs. older filing: 'Freight is transported and delivered'
- Newer filing: 'intermodal services consist of door-to-door container on flat car transportation' vs. older filing: 'intermodal services consist of door-to-door container on flat car service'
- Newer filing: 'Our intermodal operations primarily use company-owned containers, chassis, and trucks, with most drayage services performed by company drivers, supplemented by third-party drayage capacity' vs. older filing: 'Our intermodal business uses company-owned containers, chassis, and trucks with primarily company dray drivers, augmented by third-party dray capacity'
- Newer filing: 'our ability to effectively balance our transportation network and efficiently manage resources' vs. older filing: 'our ability to balance our transportation network and efficiently and effectively manage our resources'
- Newer filing: 'to manage and move customer freight efficiently' vs. older filing: 'to manage and move our customers' freight'
- Newer filing: 'obtain qualified third-party capacity at competitive rates' vs. older filing: 'obtain qualified third-party capacity at reasonable prices'
- Newer filing: 'operating expenses tend to be higher in the winter months' vs. older filing: 'Operating expenses tend to be higher in the winter months' (capitalization change)
- Notes:
- The newer filing presents a different reporting period (Q1 2026/2025) compared to the older filing (Q3 2025/2024 plus nine-month data), making direct operational comparison limited
- Text truncation occurs in both filings at the end of provided excerpts, potentially obscuring additional changes in the full footnotes and reconciliations
- Some changes appear to be refinements in phrasing rather than substantive modifications to the business description
Risk Factors
- Added:
- Added 'inventory management,' to 3PL definition (filed 2026-05-01)
- Added 'warehousing,' to 3PL definition (filed 2026-05-01)
- Removed:
- Removed 'SNL Schneider National Leasing, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company' from Glossary of Terms (filed 2025-10-30)
- Changed reference from 'Note 12, Commitments and Contingencies' to 'Note 11, Commitments and Contingencies' in forward-looking statements section (filed 2026-05-01)
- Reworded:
- 3PL definition changed from 'a company's use of third-party businesses, the 3PL(s), to outsource elements of the company's distribution, fulfillment, and supply chain management services' to 'Provider of outsourced logistics services. In logistics and supply chain management, it means a third-party provider to whom elements of the company's inventory management, distribution, order fulfillment, warehousing, or supply chain management services have been outsourced.' (filed 2026-05-01)
- Notes:
- The provided text samples appear truncated and do not include the full Risk Factors section content, limiting comprehensive comparison to introductory materials and definitions only
AI-assisted comparison of two SEC filing sections. It describes wording and theme changes only, makes no materiality, legal, or investment judgement, and is not financial advice. Informational only — not financial advice.
Insider activity (SEC Form 4)
0 open-market purchases and 6 open-market sales by insiders in the last 90 days.
- Last 30 days0 buys · 4 sells ($3M) — 1 selling insider
- Last 90 days0 buys · 6 sells ($4M) — 3 selling insiders
- Last 180 days0 buys · 9 sells ($4M) — 5 selling insiders
Activity heuristic: net selling (a transparent product heuristic from the counts above, not a prediction or advice)
Most recent open-market transaction: 2026-08-04. As of 2026-08-24.
View full insider trading history → View SEC Form 3/4/5 filingsAsk about SNDR's insider activity →
Only open-market purchases (SEC code P) and sales (code S) are counted here. Option exercises, vesting/awards, gifts, and shares withheld for taxes are excluded — they are compensation or mechanical, not open-market conviction. Sales may be planned and non-discretionary (e.g. a Rule 10b5-1 plan) and are not necessarily bearish; open-market buying is not a recommendation to buy. Informational only — not financial advice.
Congressional trading disclosures
U.S. House members publicly disclose their own, their spouse's, and dependent children's stock transactions under the STOCK Act. We hold 7 matched disclosures for SNDR from U.S. House Clerk Periodic Transaction Report filings.
Congressional trading disclosures →Institutional ownership (13F)
5 institutional 13F filers reported holding SNDR as of 2026-03-31 (quarter-end position, filed within 45 days).
- Distinct 13F filers 5
- Reported shares held 9,397,477
- Reported value $247,907,092
reported quarterly holdings change (2025-12-31 → 2026-03-31): 0 new, 4 increased, 1 decreased, 0 exited. Change counts cover only managers that filed 13F reports in BOTH quarters, derived between two quarter-end snapshots — not same-day trades; a single manager is never said to have "bought" or "sold".
Institutional holdings are quarter-end long positions reported on SEC Form 13F-HR, filed up to 45 days after the quarter ends — they are delayed, are not real-time trades, exclude short positions and most non-US securities, and are not investment advice. Any increase/decrease is a reported change between two quarterly snapshots, not a same-day purchase or sale. These are quarter-end snapshots from the 13F filings on SEC EDGAR, filed within 45 days — not real-time, and any change is a difference between two quarterly reports, not a same-day trade. Informational only — not financial advice.
Short interest (FINRA)
SNDR had 6,176,595 shares of reported short interest as of the 2026-07-31 FINRA settlement date (delayed, bi-monthly; not real-time).
Short interest as a percent of shares outstanding is not shown for SNDR because we do not hold a verified share count to divide it by. The reported figures above are unaffected.
- Reported short interest (shares) 6,176,595
- Prior settlement (shares) 5,789,268
- Reported change 6.69%
- Days to cover (reported) 5.39
Reported to FINRA as of the 2026-07-31 settlement date. Short interest is reported to FINRA and published on a delayed, bi-monthly schedule (as of a settlement date, disseminated roughly eight business days later) — it is NOT real-time, does not cover every venue or all US trading, and is not a short-squeeze prediction or investment advice. Days-to-cover is the value FINRA reports; percent of float is not shown because the source file carries no share-count denominator — where a percent appears it is of shares OUTSTANDING, the larger base, and is therefore a floor on percent of float. Informational only — not financial advice.
Competitors & peers
- J.B. Hunt Transport Services (JBHT)
- Werner Enterprises (WERN)
- Knight-Swift Transportation (KNX)
- Old Dominion Freight Line (ODFL)
- Landstar System (LSTR)
- C.H. Robinson Worldwide (CHRW)
AI-enriched competitor set. Linked names are companies covered by stocks-llm; other named peers are shown for reference only.
Compare SNDR vs…
Schneider National is found in…
Frequently asked questions
What does Schneider National (SNDR) do?
Schneider National provides a broad portfolio of transportation and logistics services, including truckload, intermodal, and third-party logistics (3PL) solutions. The company operates through a network of company-owned assets and partner carriers to manage supply chain, distribution, and freight transportation needs.
What sector is Schneider National (SNDR) in?
Schneider National (SNDR) is classified in the Industrials sector. Its industry is trucking and logistics. It trades on NYSE.
Does SNDR pay a dividend?
Yes — Schneider National (SNDR) pays a dividend, with an indicated yield of about 1.56% and at least 5 years of non-decreasing per-share dividends (SEC EDGAR XBRL) — we do not hold the year before it, so the real streak may be longer (market data, as of 2026-08-24). Informational only — not financial advice.
Who are Schneider National's (SNDR) competitors?
Notable peers of Schneider National (SNDR) include J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Werner Enterprises, Knight-Swift Transportation, Old Dominion Freight Line and Landstar System. This peer set is informational only — not financial advice.
Has there been recent Congressional stock trading in SNDR?
Yes — we hold 7 matched STOCK Act disclosures for SNDR from U.S. House Clerk Periodic Transaction Report filings. These are legally-required disclosures (often filed 30–45 days after the trade), may belong to a U.S. House member, their spouse, or a dependent child, and are not an indicator of company performance or investment advice.
Is Schneider National (SNDR) overbought or oversold right now?
Schneider National (SNDR) is currently neither overbought nor oversold — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 50, in the neutral middle (as of 2026-08-21). RSI describes recent price momentum, not a forecast — informational only, not financial advice.
Where does stocks-llm's data on SNDR come from?
Fundamentals and prices come from market data, as of 2026-08-24; company filings and profile facts come from SEC EDGAR. All figures are delayed daily-close data shown with their as-of date — informational only, not financial advice.
Fundamentals: market data, as of 2026-08-24. Filings: SEC EDGAR. Prices are delayed daily-close data.
Last updated 2026-08-21.
Informational only — NOT financial advice. All figures are delayed daily-close data from SEC EDGAR & market data, shown with their as-of date.