Skip to content

NEPTUNE INSURANCE HOLDINGS INC CLA (NP)

Financials · insurance technology (insurtech) · NYSE

Neptune Insurance Holdings is a technology-driven insurance provider digitizing the flood insurance sector with its proprietary Triton underwriting engine.

What NEPTUNE INSURANCE HOLDINGS INC CLA does

Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. is an insurance technology company primarily focused on the flood insurance market. The company leverages its proprietary technology platform, including the Triton engine, to provide streamlined, digital insurance solutions for policyholders.

Themes: insurtech, flood insurance, digital transformation in insurance

Fundamentals

  • Price$33.36 as of 2026-08-21 close
  • Market cap$4.4B as of 2026-08-24
  • P/E112.85 as of 2026-08-24
  • Net margin+21.4% as of 2026-08-24
  • Gross margin+69.6% as of 2026-08-24
  • ROE-2.9% as of 2026-08-24
  • Debt / equity156.95 as of 2026-08-24
  • Revenue growth (YoY)+38.2% as of 2026-08-24
  • Revenue CAGR (3y)+37.1% SEC XBRL
  • Beta-0.07 as of 2026-08-24
  • Last reported earnings2026-04-22 SEC EDGAR Form 8-K (Item 2.02)

Dividend: yield +5.7%; pays a dividend.

Ask why NP looks like this →

How NP compares in its sector

  • price-to-earnings ratiotop 10% 525 covered Financials peers, as of 2026-08-24
  • net profit marginmiddle range 538 covered Financials peers, as of 2026-08-24
  • operating margintop 25% 534 covered Financials peers, as of 2026-08-24
  • gross marginmiddle range 176 covered Financials peers, as of 2026-08-24
  • return on equitybottom 10% 575 covered Financials peers, as of 2026-08-24
  • 3-year revenue CAGRtop 25% 347 covered Financials peers
  • indicated dividend yieldtop 25% 453 covered Financials peers, as of 2026-08-24

Position among covered Financials companies that report each metric (minimum 5 peers). A relative position within our covered catalog — not a valuation, quality, or investment judgment. A higher percentile is simply a higher value (for P/E, more expensive on earnings — never "better"). Informational only.

Ask how NP stacks up against peers →

Top 10 scores & list membership

NP is not currently in any published Top 10 list. Its scores are below.

Long-term score

Not scored for the long-term list: no shareholder return data.

Short-term score

43.8 #1199 of 1,704 scored · #214 of 277 in Financials

  • Trend62.6
  • Momentum56.3
  • Setup75.0
  • Volume and participation35.7
  • Catalysts32.5

Setup 75th: day-to-day price swings are unusually narrow versus its own recent history — a "Bollinger squeeze" (in the tightest 1% of the past ~6 months), which often precedes a bigger move; trend 63rd: the price is 4% above the average price paid over the period covered, so the typical buyer over that stretch is showing a gain; weakest is catalysts 33rd: open-market insider buys in 90 days 0, analysts' average price target is unchanged from the prior reading. Its score is docked 10 points for overextended (RSI above 75 or stochastic above 90).

Scores as of 21 Aug 2026. Each bar is a percentile: how this company ranked against every company the score ranked, 0–100. A list is a published formula and its output, not a recommendation. Method version 2.

Dividend coverage (FY2025)

Exceeded at least one reported measure. In FY2025, NP's dividend exceeded at least one reported measure of what it earned or generated (earnings payout 468%, operating-cash-flow payout 339%). A payout above 100% in one year is not necessarily unsustainable, but it is not fully covered by that measure.

  • Earnings payout468% dividends / net income
  • Operating-cash-flow payout339% dividends / operating cash flow — capital spending was not reported, so this does not subtract it

Coverage derived from reported SEC EDGAR XBRL figures for FY2025 (dividends paid vs. net income and free cash flow, same fiscal year). This describes PAST coverage for one fiscal year — it does not predict whether a dividend will be maintained, raised, or cut, and a one-year payout ratio can be distorted by non-recurring items. Informational only — not financial advice.

Ask whether NP's dividend is covered →

How NEPTUNE INSURANCE HOLDINGS INC CLA looks technically

NEPTUNE INSURANCE HOLDINGS INC CLA (NP) is trading 25.6% above its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a longer-term uptrend. Its 50-day average crossed above its 200-day average about 45 trading days ago — a "golden cross", a bullish long-term signal. There is no clear trend right now — the price is choppy (ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 11, below the 25 that marks a real trend). Momentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 60, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30). MACD, a trend-momentum gauge, turned bullish about 1 trading day ago (its momentum flipped positive). It made a new 20-day high about 18 trading days ago. Day-to-day price swings are unusually narrow versus its own recent history — a "Bollinger squeeze" (in the tightest 1% of the past ~6 months), which often precedes a bigger move. Trading volume is unusually light — only about 48% of its 30-day average.

Trend

8
Distance from the 200-dayit is trading 25.6% above its 200-day average, the long-term trend line — a longer-term uptrend+25.6%
50-day moving averageits average price over the last 50 trading days — a short-term trend line — is $31.10$31.10
200-day moving averageits average price over the last 200 trading days — the long-term trend line — is $26.57$26.57
Swing structureeach recent peak has been higher than the one before it and each dip has been shallower — the pattern chart-watchers call an uptrend, which describes where price has already been and not where it goes nexthigher highs and higher lows
Last swing turnits last significant turn was a swing high 23 calendar days ago — the swings before that are what the structure reading is measured on23 sessions
Wave structureits recent swings can be read as a completed three-part upward correction — a pullback in the A-B-C shape Elliott-wave chartists use; the labelling fails if price closes above 35.125. It is the only labelling that fits, and it describes the swings already printed, not what comes next.possible three-wave upward correction, complete
Since the 50/200 crossits 50-day average crossed above its 200-day average about 45 trading days ago — a "golden cross", a bullish long-term signal45 sessions
Trend strength (14-day ADX)there is no clear trend right now — the price is choppy (ADX, a 0–100 trend-strength gauge, is 11, below the 25 that marks a real trend)11.4

Momentum

3
14-day RSImomentum is neutral — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 60, neither overbought (above 70) nor oversold (below 30)59.6
Position in its 14-day rangeit is trading near the top of its 14-day range ($30.70 to $33.54) — its "stochastic" reading is 94 out of 100, where 0 would mean closing exactly at the 14-session low and 100 exactly at the high. This measures WHERE the price sits inside its recent range, which is a different question from the RSI beside it: RSI is a momentum gauge, measuring how FAST the price has been moving, so a stock can drift quietly to the bottom of its range with an ordinary RSI, or fall sharply and still sit in the middle. It has been climbing within that range over the last few sessions.93.7
Since the MACD crossed zeroMACD, a trend-momentum gauge, turned bullish about 1 trading day ago (its momentum flipped positive)1 session

Range

12
52-week highits highest closing price over the past year (about 252 trading days) was $35.13$35.13
From the 52-week highit is 5.0% below its 52-week high (its highest price of the past year)-5.0%
Above the 52-week lowit is 125.7% above its 52-week low (its lowest price of the past year)+125.7%
Below the 52-week highit is 5.0% below its highest point of the past year5.0%
Since a 20-day breakoutit made a new 20-day high about 18 trading days ago18 sessions
Since a 55-day breakoutit made a new 55-day high about 18 trading days ago18 sessions
All-time highits highest closing price on record is $96.15 (set on 2018-09-17)$96.15
Given back of the 52-week movenot available for this company yetn/a
From the all-time highit is 65.3% below its all-time high-65.3%
Nearest price levelnot available for this company yetn/a
All-time lowits lowest closing price on record is $3.26 (set on 2009-03-16)$3.26
Above the all-time lowit is 923.3% above its all-time low+923.3%

Volatility

5
Band width vs its own 6 monthsday-to-day price swings are unusually narrow versus its own recent history — a "Bollinger squeeze" (in the tightest 1% of the past ~6 months), which often precedes a bigger move0th percentile
Typical daily rangein a typical session it travels about $1.54 between its high and its low — about 4.6% of its price. That is its "average true range" over the last 14 sessions, which also counts the distance from the previous close, so a day that opens well away from yesterday counts as the large move it was$1.54
Bollinger bands (20-day, ±2σ)most of its recent trading has stayed between about $30.11 and $33.95 — the "Bollinger bands", a range drawn two standard deviations either side of its 20-day average price, which widens when the stock gets more volatile and narrows when it settles$30.11 – $32.03 – $33.95
Typical daily range (% of price)its price moves about 4.6% in a typical session — about typical for the companies we cover. This is the average gap between a session's high and low over the last 14 sessions, counting overnight moves, expressed against the current price so it can be compared with companies trading at any price4.6%
Stretch from the 200-day averageit is trading 4.4 daily ranges above its 200-day average price (25.6% above it in plain percentage terms) — a way of asking how far it has stretched from its own average in units of how far it normally moves in a day, so a calm company and a jumpy one can be compared on the same scale4.4 daily ranges above its 200-day average

Volume

1
Volume vs its 30-day averagetrading volume is unusually light — only about 48% of its 30-day average0.48×

Analyst

2
Change in the average price targetanalysts have raised their average price target by 1.1% since the prior reading+1.1%
Change in the consensus ratingthe analyst consensus rating has improved toward "buy" since the prior reading0.08 toward buy

Candlestick patterns

2
Since a doji2 sessions ago it opened and closed at almost the same price after trading through a wider range — a "doji", the classic picture of buyers and sellers finishing the session level2 sessions ago
Since a bullish engulfing1 session ago it opened below the previous session's close and finished above that session's open — a "bullish engulfing" pair, where one up day more than undid the down day before it1 session ago

Price gaps

3
Gap at the openit opened on 2026-08-21 1.3% below the previous session's close — an overnight gap, the part of the move that happened while the market was shut, and traded back through that level before the close-1.3%
Open gapit gapped 3.2% above the previous close 2 sessions ago and has not traded back through the level it left behind at 31.5 — an "unfilled gap", which describes a price range no trade has since crossed and is not a forecast that it will be crossed+3.2%
Gap filleda 3.0% gap up opened on 2026-07-27 has been "filled" 19 sessions ago — price traded back through the level the gap left behind, and it closed again during the very session that opened it19 sessions ago

Price streaks

1
Closing streakit has closed higher 4 sessions in a row, a +5.97% move over the run — an unbroken run of up days, which describes what has already happened and says nothing about the next session4 sessions up

Relative strength

4
vs market, 1 monthover the past 1 month this stock beat the market by 7.6 percentage points (the stock gained 10.0% while the market gained 2.3%)+7.6%
vs market, 3 monthsover the past 3 months this stock beat the market by 19.2 percentage points (the stock gained 22.3% while the market gained 3.1%)+19.2%
vs market, 6 monthsover the past 6 months this stock beat the market by 46.0 percentage points (the stock gained 57.1% while the market gained 11.1%)+46.0%
vs market, 12 monthsnot available for this company yetn/a

Signal agreement

2
Bullish technical signals5 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it are currently in a bullish state: a "golden cross" — its 50-day average is above its 200-day, trading above its 200-day average, MACD momentum is positive, outperforming the market over 6 months, trading above the Ichimoku cloud — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast5 of 9
Bearish technical signals1 of the 9 technical signals we can compute for it is currently in a bearish state: near the top of its 14-day range (overbought) — these describe past price behaviour, not a forecast1 of 9

Trend (Ichimoku cloud)

1
Vs the Ichimoku cloudtrading 7.4% above the Ichimoku cloud — a band drawn from where its own highs and lows sat up to 2026-07-16 and projected forward over today's price, the side traders read as an established uptrend, with the band below acting as the level that would have to give way. The band itself is moderate, spanning 5.3% of the share price.+7.4%

Volume-weighted price

2
Vs this year’s average price paidthe price is 21% above the average price paid so far this year, so the typical buyer over that stretch is showing a gain. That average is $27.60 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 150 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP.+20.9%
Vs the average paid since it last reportedthe price is 4% above the average price paid since it last reported on 2026-07-27 (its 10-Q), so the typical buyer over that stretch is showing a gain. That average is $32.20 — a volume-weighted average of daily closes over 20 sessions, not a true tick-by-tick VWAP.+3.6%

Wave structure

Its recent swings can be read as a three-part upward correction — the A-B-C shape chartists use for a pullback — now complete.

This labelling fails — stops being a possible reading at all — if it closes above $35.13.

It is the only labelling that fits these swings, though its proportions are not the textbook ones.

This labelling was already in place when we began recording count changes on 2026-08-13, so how long it has stood is not something we can say yet.

Read from daily closes as of 2026-08-21.

An Elliott-wave count describes the swings already printed and the level that would disprove it. It is not a forecast, a target, or advice.

Based on daily closing prices as of 2026-08-21. Describes past price behavior only — informational, not financial advice.

Ask about NP's technicals →

Analyst consensus

  • Consensus ratingBuy (2.00 mean, 1=Strong Buy…5=Strong Sell) — 13 analysts
  • Mean price target$34.54 range $31.00 – $39.00; median $33.00

Analyst estimates, as of 2026-08-23. These are third-party analyst opinions and price targets, aggregated — not a recommendation, prediction, or advice from stocks-llm. Informational only.

Analyst EPS estimate for NP

  • Consensus EPS estimate$0.158 next reporting period, as of 2026-08-23

Change over time is not available yet: it needs two readings of the same reporting period at least 30 days apart, and we have been recording these estimates since 2026-08-04. An estimate for a DIFFERENT quarter is not a revision, so a reading from before the last report is never compared with one after it.

The consensus estimate for the next reporting period, and how it has moved between readings of that SAME period. A change is measured only between readings estimating one period — when a company reports, the consensus moves to the next quarter and the two numbers are not comparable. Informational only, not a forecast and not advice.

Ask how NP's estimates have moved →

Key risks (from latest filing)

["Significant accumulated deficit and historical unprofitability","High leverage from revolving credit facility debt obligations","Dependence on proprietary technology systems and potential operational disruption"]

See NP's biggest risks from its latest 10-Q →

What changed in the latest 10-Q

AI-assisted comparison of NP's 10-Q filed 2026-04-29 against the prior one filed 2025-11-12.

Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A)

  • Added:
    • Newer filing adds reference to 'Risk Factors' in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K that could cause actual results to differ materially
    • Newer filing specifies capacity providers count as of March 31, 2026: 42 capacity providers including 34 reinsurance providers backing 8 distinct insurance programs
    • Newer filing reports eligible policy retention rate of 86.2% and premium retention rate of 92.9% for three months ended March 31, 2026
    • Newer filing adds explanation that premium retention rate difference reflects increases to rates charged to renewing policyholders
  • Removed:
    • Older filing references Final Prospectus dated September 30, 2025 and IPO details—removed in newer filing
    • Older filing references 'Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements' section—removed in newer filing
    • Older filing states 33 capacity providers as of September 30, 2025, including 26 reinsurance providers backing 6 distinct insurance programs—superseded by newer figures
    • Older filing describes seventh insurance program inception on October 1, 2025 with 6 additional reinsurers and reference to 39 total capacity providers—updated in newer filing
    • Older filing reports eligible policy retention rates of 86.7% (three months) and 86.2% (nine months) and premium retention rates of 98.0% (three months) and 98.7% (nine months) for September 30, 2025—replaced with newer data
  • Reworded:
    • Older filing states 'we believe that we have a high retention rates to date'; newer filing states 'we believe that we have a high degree of visibility into our future revenue streams' as reasoning
    • Older filing says 'four of the ten largest flood events'; newer filing says '4 of the 10 largest flood events'
    • Older filing says 'machine learning' in full; newer filing uses 'ML' abbreviation in Overview section
    • Reference to 'our Final Prospectus' and IPO-related citations removed; forward-looking statements language restructured to reference only Annual Report on Form 10-K
    • Older filing references 'unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements' and 'Item 1 hereto'; newer filing uses standard consolidated financial statements language
  • Notes:
    • The older filing text appears truncated at the end ('broader insuran'); full comparison of subsequent sections not possible
    • Retention rate metrics changed materially between periods—eligible policy retention remained similar (86.7% vs 86.2%) but premium retention declined significantly (98.0%/98.7% vs 92.9%), suggesting meaningful shift in renewal dynamics

Risk Factors

The two filings could not be meaningfully compared for this section.

AI-assisted comparison of two SEC filing sections. It describes wording and theme changes only, makes no materiality, legal, or investment judgement, and is not financial advice. Informational only — not financial advice.

Ask what changed in NP's latest 10-Q →

Insider activity (SEC Form 4)

0 open-market purchases and 2 open-market sales by insiders in the last 90 days.

  • Last 30 days0 buys · 2 sells ($116M) — 2 selling insiders
  • Last 90 days0 buys · 2 sells ($116M) — 2 selling insiders
  • Last 180 days1 buy ($935345) · 6 sells ($415M) — 1 buying, 2 selling insiders

Cluster buying: 3 different insiders reported open-market purchases (SEC code P) of NP within a 30-day window between 2025-10-02 and 2025-10-02. Disclosed Form 4 activity, not a prediction of performance or a buy signal.

Activity heuristic: net selling (a transparent product heuristic from the counts above, not a prediction or advice)

Most recent open-market transaction: 2026-07-29. As of 2026-08-24.

View full insider trading history → View SEC Form 3/4/5 filings

Ask about NP's insider activity →

Only open-market purchases (SEC code P) and sales (code S) are counted here. Option exercises, vesting/awards, gifts, and shares withheld for taxes are excluded — they are compensation or mechanical, not open-market conviction. Sales may be planned and non-discretionary (e.g. a Rule 10b5-1 plan) and are not necessarily bearish; open-market buying is not a recommendation to buy. Informational only — not financial advice.

Institutional ownership (13F)

4 institutional 13F filers reported holding NP as of 2026-03-31 (quarter-end position, filed within 45 days).

  • Distinct 13F filers 4
  • Reported shares held 655,765
  • Reported value $15,862,955

reported quarterly holdings change (2025-12-31 → 2026-03-31): 0 new, 3 increased, 1 decreased, 1 exited. Change counts cover only managers that filed 13F reports in BOTH quarters, derived between two quarter-end snapshots — not same-day trades; a single manager is never said to have "bought" or "sold".

Institutional holdings are quarter-end long positions reported on SEC Form 13F-HR, filed up to 45 days after the quarter ends — they are delayed, are not real-time trades, exclude short positions and most non-US securities, and are not investment advice. Any increase/decrease is a reported change between two quarterly snapshots, not a same-day purchase or sale. These are quarter-end snapshots from the 13F filings on SEC EDGAR, filed within 45 days — not real-time, and any change is a difference between two quarterly reports, not a same-day trade. Informational only — not financial advice.

Ask about NP's institutional holders →

Short interest (FINRA)

NP had 2,485,281 shares of reported short interest as of the 2026-07-31 FINRA settlement date (delayed, bi-monthly; not real-time).

Short interest as a percent of shares outstanding is not shown for NP because we do not hold a verified share count to divide it by. The reported figures above are unaffected.

  • Reported short interest (shares) 2,485,281
  • Prior settlement (shares) 2,074,982
  • Reported change 19.77%
  • Days to cover (reported) 2.64

Reported to FINRA as of the 2026-07-31 settlement date. Short interest is reported to FINRA and published on a delayed, bi-monthly schedule (as of a settlement date, disseminated roughly eight business days later) — it is NOT real-time, does not cover every venue or all US trading, and is not a short-squeeze prediction or investment advice. Days-to-cover is the value FINRA reports; percent of float is not shown because the source file carries no share-count denominator — where a percent appears it is of shares OUTSTANDING, the larger base, and is therefore a floor on percent of float. Informational only — not financial advice.

Ask about NP's short interest →

Competitors & peers

AI-enriched competitor set. Linked names are companies covered by stocks-llm; other named peers are shown for reference only.

Not quite? Describe exactly what you want →

Compare NP vs…

NEPTUNE INSURANCE HOLDINGS INC CLA is found in…

NP ranks in…

Frequently asked questions

What does NEPTUNE INSURANCE HOLDINGS INC CLA (NP) do?

Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc. is an insurance technology company primarily focused on the flood insurance market. The company leverages its proprietary technology platform, including the Triton engine, to provide streamlined, digital insurance solutions for policyholders.

What sector is NEPTUNE INSURANCE HOLDINGS INC CLA (NP) in?

NEPTUNE INSURANCE HOLDINGS INC CLA (NP) is classified in the Financials sector. Its industry is insurance technology (insurtech). It trades on NYSE.

Does NP pay a dividend?

Yes — NEPTUNE INSURANCE HOLDINGS INC CLA (NP) pays a dividend, with an indicated yield of about 5.68% (market data, as of 2026-08-24). Informational only — not financial advice.

Who are NEPTUNE INSURANCE HOLDINGS INC CLA's (NP) competitors?

Notable peers of NEPTUNE INSURANCE HOLDINGS INC CLA (NP) include Assurant, Progressive and Allstate. This peer set is informational only — not financial advice.

Is NEPTUNE INSURANCE HOLDINGS INC CLA (NP) overbought or oversold right now?

NEPTUNE INSURANCE HOLDINGS INC CLA (NP) is currently neither overbought nor oversold — its 14-day RSI (a 0–100 momentum gauge) is 60, in the neutral middle (as of 2026-08-21). RSI describes recent price momentum, not a forecast — informational only, not financial advice.

Where does stocks-llm's data on NP come from?

Fundamentals and prices come from market data, as of 2026-08-24; company filings and profile facts come from SEC EDGAR. All figures are delayed daily-close data shown with their as-of date — informational only, not financial advice.

Fundamentals: market data, as of 2026-08-24. Filings: SEC EDGAR. Prices are delayed daily-close data.

Last updated 2026-08-21.

Informational only — NOT financial advice. All figures are delayed daily-close data from SEC EDGAR & market data, shown with their as-of date.

Research stocks in your own words.

Informational only — NOT financial advice.

ScreenersBlogPrivacyiOS app